Neuroimaging clinics of North America
-
Turf issues in medicine affect policy, practice, and, most importantly, patients. This article explores turf issues from several perspectives. ⋯ Finally, this article focuses on proposed strategies to successfully confront the questions, if not overcome the problems encountered. To better inform the deliberation and strengthen the credibility of any conclusions, the evidence and controversies must be regarded from beyond merely the radiology perspective.
-
Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. · Aug 2012
ReviewMedicolegal hazards: potential pitfalls for neuroimagers.
One of the major pitfalls faced by physicians is a basic lack of understanding of the legal aspects of medical malpractice. It is the authors' hope that the brief review of the history of malpractice law provided here affords the radiologist insights that could prove helpful in understanding how one must conduct oneself in a radiology practice. ⋯ Vigilance and minimizing errors is always most desirable, but error-free neuroradiology is unattainable. Best medical judgment, although not error free, is at least defensible as noted in the case law discussed here.
-
Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. · May 2012
ReviewHead and neck high-field imaging: oncology applications.
Head and neck imaging has benefited from 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, providing faster sequences, better soft tissue evaluation, and 3-axis imaging, with less radiation and iodine-based contrast injection. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved human MR imaging at high-field strength up to 4 T in clinical practice. 3 T MR imaging has become widely available, with the hope of significant advance in the evaluation of the head and neck region. This article reviews the benefits, disadvantages, and challenges of high-field imaging of the head and neck region, focusing on the imaging of head and neck cancer.