The American journal of the medical sciences
-
Patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) may experience emphysema or fibrosis progression on chest computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to investigate the relationship and prognosis in CPFE patients with emphysema or fibrosis progression. ⋯ In CPFE patients, emphysema and fibrosis progression had different higher tumour markers, risk factors, and prognosis effects. There was no significant interaction between emphysema and fibrosis progression. Fibrosis progression had a deleterious effect on prognosis, whereas emphysema progression did not affect prognosis. Therefore, the primary objective of CPFE treatment should be to halt or even reverse the progression of fibrosis. CPFE may be primarily a fibrotic disease, with emphysema being an incidental complication.
-
Catheter-directed interventions (CDIs) for pulmonary embolism (PE) continue to evolve. However, due to the paucity of data, their use has been limited in patients with underlying kidney disease. ⋯ CKD/ESRD patients requiring catheter-directed interventions for IHR-PE had higher periprocedural mortality and acute bleeding. The presence of ESRD mainly drove periprocedural mortality in our study, while the presence of non-dialyzed CKD was associated with higher rates of non-fatal localized hemorrhage.
-
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the sudden blockage of the pulmonary arteries. Although the MAGGIC risk score has emerged as a valuable tool in predicting outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure, it has also been demonstrated and identified as a prognostic model in various cardiac diseases other than heart failure. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between MAGGIC score and adverse outcomes in patients with PE. ⋯ Our study demonstrates that the MAGGIC score can be applied as a valuable prognostic tool for acute pulmonary embolism.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Comparison of 24 vs 72-hour octreotide infusion in acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage - a multi-center, randomized clinical trial.
Current guidelines lack clarity about the optimal duration of octreotide therapy for patients with esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH). To address this lack of evidence, we conducted a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 24-hr versus 72-hr continuous infusion of octreotide for patients with EVH. ⋯ A 24-hr infusion is non-inferior to a 72-hr infusion of octreotide for prevention of re-bleeding in patients with EVH. We propose that shortened octreotide duration may help reduce hospital stay and related costs in these patients.