European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
Comparative Study
Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source.
Disagreement still exists in the literature as to the significance of the high-intensity zone (HIZ) demonstrated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a potential pain indicator in patients with low back pain. A prospective blind study was therefore conducted to evaluate the lumbar disc high-intensity zone with the pain provocation response of lumbar discography. Consecutive patients with low back pain unresponsive to conservative treatment and being considered for spinal fusion were subjected to MRI followed by lumbar discography as a pre-operative assessment. ⋯ The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for pain reproduction were high, at 81%, 79% and 87% respectively. The nature of the HIZ remains unknown, but it may represent an area of secondary inflammation as a result of an annular tear. We conclude from our study that the lumbar disc HIZ observed on MRI in patients with low back pain is likely to represent painful internal disc disruption.
-
Indications and timing of surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, and the long-term results for the conditions, were reviewed. Advances in spinal imaging and accumulation of clinical experience have provided some clues as to indications and timing of surgery for cervical myelopathy. Duration of myelopathy prior to surgery and the transverse area of the spinal cord at the maximum compression level were the most significant prognostic parameters for surgical outcome. ⋯ When surgery is properly carried out, long-term surgical results are expected to be good and stable, and the natural course of myelopathy secondary to cervical spondylosis may be modified. However, little attention has been paid to the questions "When and what can surgery contribute to treatment of cervical radiculopathy?". A well-controlled clinical study including natural history should be done to provide some answers.
-
The use of transperitoneal endoscopic approaches to the distal segments of the lumbar spine has recently been described. This has been the catalyst for the development of other minimally invasive anterior approaches to the spine. ⋯ The efficacy and safety of minimal access techniques in the spine have been established, and outcome standards set by which future techniques can be judged. The importance of proper training is emphasised.
-
The terms 'minimally invasive' or 'less invasive surgery' have been used recently to describe surgical approaches or operations that are performed with less trauma to anatomical structures on the way to or surrounding the surgical 'target area'. These types of surgical procedures are usually performed with the help of 'high-tech' instruments such as surgical endoscopes or surgical microscopes, modern video techniques and automated instruments. Within the last 10 years, such techniques have been developed in the field of spinal surgery. ⋯ Through small (4-cm) skin incisions, the target area can be exposed. Preliminary results suggest decreased peri - and postoperative morbidity, less blood loss, earlier rehabilitation and acceptable complication rates. The technique is currently used by the author for all patients requiring anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
-
Transarticular C1/2 screws are widely used in posterior cervical spine instrumentation. The use of pedicle screws in the cervical spine remains uncommon. Due to superior biomechanical stability compared to lateral mass screws, pedicle screws can be used, especially for patients with poor bone quality or defects in the anterior column. ⋯ Therefore, this technique may be used in a clinical setting, as it offers improved accuracy and reduced radiation dose for the patient and the medical staff. Nevertheless, users should take note of known sources of possible faults causing inaccuracies in order to prevent iatrogenic damage. Small pedicles, with a diameter of less than 4.0 mm, may not be suitable for pedicle screws.