European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.
Pain drawings have been used in spine surgery for diagnostic use and psychological evaluation of fusion candidates; they have rarely been used to evaluate pain status after spinal fusion. This study is a 5-year follow-up on a randomised clinical trial assigning patients to posterolateral spinal fusion with or without pedicle screw instrumentation. Patients were mailed a pain drawing and questionnaires including questions regarding work, social status, smoking status, the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ), and the Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS). ⋯ Ten percent still experience donor site pain. In general, instrumentation does not affect the amount and localisation of pain 5 years after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. The pain drawing seems to be a valuable tool when following spinal fusion patients, but its use as prognostic marker in connection with fusion surgery needs further investigation.
-
Comparative Study
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: does stable anterior fixation matter?
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior lumbar interbody fusion without instrumentation (uninstrumented ALIF) against that with stable anterior cage fixation using Hartshill horseshoe instrumentation (ALIF-HH) for similar severity of disc disease. Between April 1994 and June 1998 the senior author N. R. ⋯ On subjective score assessment, there was a satisfactory outcome (score0.05). On classification by the Oswestry Index into four categories, we found no difference in outcome between the two groups: 83.3% ( n=20) had a satisfactory outcome (defined as Excellent or Better) with ALIF and 77.8% ( n=21) had a satisfactory outcome with ALIF-HH using the Oswestry Disability Index for post-operative assessment ( P>0.05). The results of this study indicate that the Hartshill horseshoe cage does improve the fusion rate, but does not affect clinical outcome.
-
There is no generally accepted scientific theory for the etiology of idiopathic scoliosis, and treatment is pragmatic and unrelated to such knowledge. As part of its mission to widen understanding of scoliosis etiology, the International Federated Body on Scoliosis Etiology (IBSE) introduced the electronic focus group (EFG) as a means of increasing debate of extant knowledge on important topics. This has been designated as an on-line Delphi discussion, and has proven very successful. ⋯ The concept does not deal with factors involved in curve progression. Sevastik advocates mini-invasive operations on the ribs as a treatment for early progressive thoracic curves. Areas of controversy include whether or not there is overgrowth of the left periapical ribs in Rcx-T-AIS-F, and the question of whether there should be a clinical trial of mini-invasive operations on the ribs.
-
Infiltrating osteoporotic cancellous bone with bone cement (vertebroplasty) is a novel surgical procedure to stabilize and prevent osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Short-term clinical and biomechanical results are encouraging; however, so far no reports on long-term results have been published. Our clinical observations suggest that vertebroplasty may induce subsequent fractures in the vertebrae adjacent to the ones augmented. ⋯ The bulge of the augmented endplate was reduced to 7% of its value before the augmentation, resulting in a stiffening of the IV joint by approximately 17%, and of the whole motion segment by approximately 11%. The IV pressure accordingly increased by approximately 19%, and the inward bulge of the endplate adjacent to the one augmented (L4 inferior) increased considerably, by approximately 17%. This increase of up to 17% in the inward bulge of the endplate adjacent to the one augmented may be the cause of the adjacent fractures.