European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
In traumatic injury there is a clear relationship between the dose of energy involved, structural tissue damage and resultant disability after recovery. This relationship is often absent in cases of non-specific chronic low back pain that is perceived by patients as attributed to a workplace injury. There are many studies assessing risk factors for non-specific low back pain. However, studies addressing causality of back pain are deficient. ⋯ Despite high-energy trauma and significant structural damage to the spine, patients with the high energy injuries had better spinal outcome scores in all measures. There is no 'dose-response' relationship between structural injury, low back pain and spinal disability. This is the reverse of what would be anticipated if structural injury was the cause of disability in workplace reported onset of low back pain.
-
Despite numerous descriptive publications, the nature, character, differential diagnosis and optimal treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs), remain obscure. The authors report a case of the solid variant of aneurysmal bone cyst (S-ABC) occurring in the posterior components and body of C7 vertebra focusing on the differential diagnosis and surgical treatment rationale. ⋯ Imaging and histological pattern of this specific type of ABC, differential diagnosis from GCT and the surgical protocol followed with the patient consist of an interesting case of revising the initial plan, according to the upcoming histological reports.
-
Comparative Study
Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine: comparison between free hand and a generic 3D-based navigation techniques.
Although pedicle screw fixation is a well-established technique for the lumbar spine, screw placement in the thoracic spine is more challenging because of the smaller pedicle size and more complex 3D anatomy. The intraoperative use of image guidance devices may allow surgeons a safer, more accurate method for placing thoracic pedicle screws while limiting radiation exposure. This generic 3D imaging technique is a new generation intraoperative CT imaging system designed without compromise to address the needs of a modern OR. ⋯ In conclusion, 3D navigation-assisted pedicle screw placement is superior to free hand technique in the thoracic spine.
-
Posterior pedicle screw instrumented correction and fusion have become the gold standard in the surgical treatment of thoracic scoliosis. However, in thoracic Lenke type C curves selective posterior fusion of the thoracic curve may lead to spinal imbalance. The aim of the study was to analyse the radiological results of selective anterior thoracic fusion using a standard open dual rod technique with special respect to spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC). ⋯ Selective anterior correction and fusion in primary thoracic curves with lumbar modifier type Lenke C resulted in a reliable and satisfactory SLCC. Advantages of anterior versus posterior techniques are the true segmental derotation with excellent rib hump correction and a superior restoration of thoracic kyphosis.
-
Placement of pedicle screws within the thoracic and lumbar spine has become the "state of the art" for the treatment of spinal deformities. Newly trained surgeons are often trained only with the placement of pedicle screws within the thoracic and lumbar spine and not with hooks or other means of fixation. However, if the benefits of pedicle screw instrumentation in terms of correction ability cannot be questioned on some issues pertaining to their safety, their rationale for all situations as well as their long-term adverse consequence and or early or late complications start to arise. ⋯ To answer our provocative title "Pedicle screw instrumentation have we gone too far?" Definitively we can answer that for some spinal deformities instrumented with all-pedicle-screw instrumentation, we have observed cases where the surgeons have gone way too far; in other cases, where such instrumentation was used in a comprehensive and rational manner, the answer to "Have we gone too far" is no, and such use of pedicle screw has improved outcome with minimum complications.