European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
Prehabilitation before spinal surgery may enhance patients' ability to withstand physical and mental stress during the perioperative period. It has the potential to reduce complications, accelerate recovery, and deliver sustainable, patient-relevant improvements. However, high-quality evidence remains limited, and it is unclear which prehabilitation concepts, training protocols, and outcomes are most effective for different patient groups. ⋯ Based on the current evidence, preparation for spinal surgery is recommended, provided that it is individualized, multimodal, and interdisciplinary, and addresses patients' specific impairments, resources, and expectations. Future research should focus on identifying subgroups defined by biopsychosocial risk factors that may influence short- and long-term perioperative outcomes.
-
A biopsychosocial assessment of a person with low back pain (LBP) should include the detection of psychological risk factors. Pragmatically, clinicians often use their clinical impression rather than questionnaires to screen for psychological risk factors. This scoping review explores how accurately depression, anxiety, and psychological distress can be identified by musculoskeletal (MSK) or spinal clinicians using clinical impression alone. ⋯ Overall, clinician impression alone is insufficient for MSK and spinal clinicians to accurately identify depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adults with LBP. The general tendency of the clinicians was to underestimate their presence. Without formal assessment of the psychological status of patients with LBP, clinicians will have an incomplete understanding of concordant psychological factors, and may fail to notice the requirement to refer on for appropriate psychological management.
-
Sacropelvic fixation plays a crucial role in complex spinal surgeries, particularly in adult spinal deformity (ASD) and other conditions requiring lumbosacral stabilization. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the rates of symptomatic screw prominence and screw removal between S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) and iliac screws, as well as those examining each screw type independently, to provide a comprehensive understanding and guide surgical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. ⋯ S2AI screws demonstrate significantly lower rates of symptomatic prominence and screw removal compared to iliac screws, supporting their clinical and economic advantages in sacropelvic fixation for ASD. Technological advancements and innovations in implant design further enhance the efficacy of S2AI screws. These findings advocate for their adoption as an effective fixation technique, reducing hardware complications and improving patient outcomes. Future studies will aim to explore factors influencing prominence risk and optimize surgical strategies in ASD treatment.
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Long-term effectiveness of stand-alone anchored spacer in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion compared with cage-plate system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
For anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), stand-alone anchored spacers (SAAS) and cage-plate system (CPS) are currently employed. However, controversy remains over the effectiveness and security of these two apparatuses in multilevel ACDF. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the global long-term effectiveness and safety of SAAS versus CPS with multilevel ACDF. ⋯ SAAS provided comparable long-term effectiveness and safeness for multilevel ACDF regarding JOA scores, NDI scores, fusion rates and ASD rates at endpoint compared to CPS. In comparison to CPS, SAAS demonstrated significant advancement in the reduction of operative time, intraoperative blood loss and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. As a consequence, SAAS appeared more desirable than CPS among people who needed multilevel ACDF. Yet in long-term observation, SAAS was inferior to CPS in maintaining CSA and FSH and in preventing cage descent. However, whether or not radiographic abnormality has an impact on clinical presentation awaits confirmation from research with more longitudinal follow-up.
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Long-term effectiveness of stand-alone anchored spacer in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion compared with cage-plate system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
For anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), stand-alone anchored spacers (SAAS) and cage-plate system (CPS) are currently employed. However, controversy remains over the effectiveness and security of these two apparatuses in multilevel ACDF. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the global long-term effectiveness and safety of SAAS versus CPS with multilevel ACDF. ⋯ SAAS provided comparable long-term effectiveness and safeness for multilevel ACDF regarding JOA scores, NDI scores, fusion rates and ASD rates at endpoint compared to CPS. In comparison to CPS, SAAS demonstrated significant advancement in the reduction of operative time, intraoperative blood loss and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. As a consequence, SAAS appeared more desirable than CPS among people who needed multilevel ACDF. Yet in long-term observation, SAAS was inferior to CPS in maintaining CSA and FSH and in preventing cage descent. However, whether or not radiographic abnormality has an impact on clinical presentation awaits confirmation from research with more longitudinal follow-up.