European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
This study aims to investigate the use of biplanar radiography for assessing congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra in 3D. ⋯ Biplanar radiography can be considered an interesting tool for clinical follow-up of congenital scoliosis as it overcomes some limitations of the analyses based on CT or anteroposterior X-ray: head to feet acquisition, low radiation dose and provides a set of automatically computed postural and morphological parameters in 3D.
-
There is controversy regarding the appropriate proximal fusion level for adult degenerative scoliosis. Ideally, the horizontal vertebra is chosen for the upper instrumented vertebra to create a balanced spine. Fusion to T10 is recommended to prevent junctional problems at the proximal adjacent segment. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the optimal proximal fusion level for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. ⋯ Proximal adjacent segment disease developed more commonly when the proximal fusion stopped at the UEV or below in adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. UIV must be above UEV in the coronal plane. Fusion to T11 or T12 was acceptable when UIV was above UEV, since there was no significant difference in the rate of proximal adjacent segment between fusion to T10 and fusion to T11 or T12.
-
The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of neural axis abnormalities in patients with presumed "idiopathic" thoracolumbar or lumbar scoliosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and try to determine which clinical and radiographic characteristics correlate with neural axis abnormalities on MRI in these patients. ⋯ We recommend the routine use of MRI in the patients with one or more of the following characteristics: right curves, long curve span, apex at thoracolumbar spine and hyperthoracic kyphosis.
-
Predictors of marked improvement versus failure to improve following surgery for adult scoliosis have not been identified. Our objective was to identify factors that distinguish between patients with the best and worst outcomes following surgery for adult scoliosis. ⋯ Not all patients achieve favorable outcomes following surgery for adult scoliosis. Baseline and peri-operative factors distinguishing between patients with the best and worst outcomes were predominantly patient factors, including BMI, depression/anxiety, smoking, and pain severity; not comorbidities, severity of deformity, operative parameters, or complications.