European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
To compare the rate of postoperative dysphagia between zero-profile anchored cage fixation (ZPC group) and cage with plate fixation (CP group) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). ⋯ Zero-profile anchored cage had a lower risk of postoperative dysphagia than cage with plate.
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been considered as a gold standard for symptomatic cervical disc degeneration (CDD), which may result in progressive degeneration of the adjacent segments. The artificial cervical disc was designed to reduce the number of lesions in the adjacent segments. Clinical studies have demonstrated equivalence of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in single segment cervical disc degeneration. But for two contiguous levels cervical disc degeneration (CDD), which kind of treatment method is better is controversial. ⋯ We can learn from this meta-analysis that the cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) group is equivalent and in some aspects has more significant clinical outcomes than the ACDF group at two contiguous levels CDD.
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical arthroplasty for patients with cervical spondylosis. ⋯ Patients undergoing ACDF therapy tended to exhibit lower overall success rate, higher VAS score, and decreased mean surgical duration when compared with patients treated with cervical arthroplasty.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.
Although many meta-analyses have been performed to compare total disc replacement (TDR) and fusion for treating lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD), their findings are inconsistent. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses comparing TDR with fusion for treating LDDD, to assist decision makers in selection among conflicting meta-analyses, and to provide treatment recommendations based on the best available evidence. ⋯ There is discord in results from meta-analyses that assessed TDR and fusion for LDDD. According to this systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses comparing TDR and fusion for LDDD, the current best available evidence suggests that TDR may be an effective technique for the treatment of selected patients with LDDD, and is at least equal to lumbar fusion in the short term. However, considering that disadvantages may appear after years, spine surgeons should be cautions about performing TDR on a large scale.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Anterior release for Scheuermann's disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Anterior release for Scheuermann's disease was considered an important technique for decades. However, posterior-only surgery for Scheuermann's disease has shown a promising potential to manage this deformity, as well. Correction loss could happen post-operatively, especially when posterior-only surgery is performed in the early days. Therefore, a dispute regarding anterior release for Scheuermann's disease exists. ⋯ A systematic review of the outcomes of Scheuermann's disease demonstrated a very similar correction loss for the AP group and the PO group. A meta-regression supported that correction loss did decrease as time moved on for the PO procedure, which could be explained by the improvements to instrumentation and techniques. For other outcomes, the PO group showed advantages in blood loss, surgery time, and junctional kyphosis. Similar outcomes were observed in relation to aspects of cosmetic improvement and pain relief for the AP and PO groups. The revision rate was mildly lower in the PO group than in the AP group.