Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Nausea and vomiting with use of a patient-controlled analgesia system.
The incidence of nausea and vomiting following patient controlled analgesia and intramuscular morphine injections on demand was compared in a double-blind randomised study of 32 healthy patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean 24 hour postoperative morphine consumption, subjective experience of pain, nausea and sedation assessed by visual linear analogue scoring, and the postoperative requirements for antiemetic therapy.
-
A preliminary study was performed to calculate the cost of intensive therapy on an individual patient basis. The fixed (equipment, supporting services and land opportunity), semi-fixed (staff) and marginal (treatment) costs of 20 critically ill patients were calculated individually. The results show that there is wide variation in intensive therapy costs. ⋯ The mean total cost per patient was 1980 pounds, but the cost per survivor increased by 16% (347 pounds) because of four deaths on the intensive care unit. High total costs are associated with increased severity of illness and higher marginal (treatment) costs are associated with increased semi-fixed (staff) costs. The cost of intensive therapy was three to five times that for general ward care.
-
Accidental cannulation of an extradural vein is a troublesome and potentially serious complication of extradural catheter insertion. This study was conducted to assess the influence of posture, catheter size and the injection of saline before catheter insertion, on its occurrence. ⋯ The use of 18-gauge catheters, after injection of 10 ml of 0.9% saline, resulted in a significant (p less than 0.01) reduction in the incidence of extradural vein cannulation. This technique is recommended in obstetric patients as a means of avoiding accidental intravenous injection of local analgesic.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation. Comparison of patient-controlled propofol with anaesthetist-administered midazolam and fentanyl.
The quality of sedation and postoperative recovery have been assessed for intra-operative sedation provided by either patient-controlled sedation with propofol or a standard method using divided doses of midazolam and fentanyl, in 40 ASA 1 day surgery patients undergoing extraction of third molar teeth under local analgesia. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol produced sedation no deeper than full eyelid closure with prompt response to verbal command, but deeper levels were seen in three patients in the midazolam and fentanyl group. Patient satisfaction was higher in the patient-controlled sedation propofol group for both subjective intra-operative feelings (p less than 0.01) and willingness to have the procedure again in the same manner (p less than 0.05). ⋯ Drug dose was correlated with duration of procedure and surgical difficulty in the patient-controlled sedation propofol group but not in the midazolam and fentanyl group. Postoperative testing included a new computerised test, the FAST index, which indicated a dose-dependent reduction in cognitive function in the midazolam and fentanyl group, which persisted until the time of discharge. Changes in cognitive function in the patient-controlled sedation propofol group in the same postoperative interval were significantly less and not related to propofol dose.