Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation: a randomised controlled trial comparing the GlideRite® (Parker-Flex® Tip) nasal tracheal tube with a standard pre-rotated nasal RAE™ tracheal tube.
In a randomised controlled study, we compared the ease of railroading a GlideRite® nasal tracheal tube over a fibrescope with that of a pre-rotated RAE™ nasal tracheal tube. We studied 110 anaesthetised patients with no known airway difficulties undergoing elective dental or maxillofacial surgery. ⋯ The median (IQR [range]) time to intubation (GlideRite 7.6 (4.7-10.8 [3.0-46.2]) s; RAE 8.0 (6.2-10.7 [2.4-30.0]) s) and postoperative sore throat numerical ratings (GlideRite 2 (0-3 [0-10]); RAE 2 (0-5 [0-8])) were similar. A 90° anticlockwise pre-rotation of a standard nasal RAE tube has a higher initial rate of successful railroading at first attempt and is therefore superior to a GlideRite nasotracheal tube during nasal fibreoptic intubation.
-
We describe the case of a fit 17-year-old man who developed a severe allergic reaction to a low clinical dose of sugammadex (3.2 mg kg(-1) , 200 mg intravenously), 1 min after its administration. This was manifest by an intense erythema over the anterior part of the thorax, severe lip and palpebral oedema and bilateral wheeze. On later investigation, the patient had a positive skin prick test to sugammadex (5-mm diameter response, with a negative saline control and positive histamine control of 5 mm) and no response to any other drug tested. Other diagnostic tests supported a diagnosis of allergic reaction to sugammadex.
-
Comment Letter Comparative Study
Comparing ultrasound and nerve stimulation: time to ask the question?