Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The educational value of using cumulative sum charts.
Various workplace-based assessment tools are available, but none have been shown to improve performance in procedural skills. This study aimed to assess the impact of using one such tool, cumulative sum charts, on procedural skill ability. A single-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted on 82 final year medical students. ⋯ Students in the intervention group obtained median (IQR [range]) scores of 68.2 (60.5-74.3 [42.7-81.1]) vs 62.2 (52.2-68.8 [40.7-80.5]) for the control group (p = 0.013). The effect size was moderate (Cohen's d = 0.608). This study therefore provides support for the hypothesis that use of cumulative sum charts improves performance when learning procedural skills.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A randomised trial comparing the CEL-100 videolaryngoscope(TM) with the Macintosh laryngoscope blade for insertion of double-lumen tubes.
We performed a randomised trial comparing the CEL-100 videolaryngoscope(TM) with the Macintosh laryngoscope blade in 170 patients undergoing double-lumen tube placement for thoracic surgery. Compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope blade, use of the CEL-100 resulted in significantly more patients with a Cormack and Lehane Grade-1 laryngeal view (90.4% vs 61.0%, p < 0.001), a higher rate of successful intubation on the first attempt (92.8% vs 79.3%, p = 0.012), a lower median (IQR [range]) intubation difficulty score (0 (0-0 [0-60]) vs 15 (0-30 [0-80]), p < 0.001), a higher incidence of correct positioning of the tube (90.3% vs 79.2%, p = 0.041) and significantly fewer patients requiring external laryngeal pressure (19.3% vs 32.9%, p = 0.046). Median (IQR [range]) time to successful intubation was 45 (38-55 [22-132]) s with the CEL-100 compared with 51 (40-61 [30-160] s using the Macintosh laryngoscope blade. We conclude that the CEL-100 videolaryngoscope is superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope blade for double-lumen tube insertion.
-
Comparative Study
Clinical evaluation of a new tracheal impedance cardiography method.
Non-invasive cardiac output measurement by means of impedance cardiography has been evaluated before, and agreement with other methods has been variable. We decided to study a newly developed tracheal impedance device, that is claimed to be more accurate and reliable. This incorporates new software and mathematical formulae, that are designed to reduce signal noise from diathermy, leading to improved accuracy. ⋯ Mean cardiac output, bias and 95% limits of agreement were 5.3, 0.03 and -2.8 to 2.8 l.min(-1) , respectively. Tracheal impedance showed good correlation with measurement trends using thermodilution in 88% of measurements, with a mean (95% limit of agreement) angular bias of -9.0° (-83.3 to 65.3°). However, the wide limits of agreement and high percentage error of 53% that were apparent in this study mean that, in its present guise, tracheal impedance is not an acceptable alternative to thermodilution in cardiac surgical patients.