Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A randomised comparison of variable-frequency automated mandatory boluses with a basal infusion for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour and delivery.
This trial was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of administering variable-frequency automated boluses at a rate proportional to the patient's needs with fixed continuous basal infusion in patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) during labour and delivery. We recruited a total of 102 parturients in labour who were randomly assigned to receive either a novel PCEA with automated mandatory boluses of 5 ml administered once, twice, three or four times per hour depending on the history of the parturient's analgesic demands over the past hour (Automated bolus group), or a conventional PCEA with a basal infusion of 5 ml.h(-1) (Infusion group). ⋯ Parturients from the Automated bolus group reported higher satisfaction scores compared with those in the Infusion group, 96.5 (5.0) vs 89.2 (9.4), respectively (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of maternal side-effects and obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Modified patient-controlled remifentanil bolus delivery regimen for labour pain*.
To improve the analgesic efficiency and to simplify the administration of remifentanil for systemic analgesia in labour, we contrived a modified delivery regimen with a specific infusion profile and variable dosing and conducted a single-blind randomised crossover study to compare it with the previous 'classical' regimen. Parturients received both regimens in interchangeable sets, each with five contractions. ⋯ No differences in observed parameters were noticed except for slightly lower blood pressure with the modified regimen. Pain estimates were lower in women starting with the modified regimen (p = 0.005), and there were fewer requests for analgesia within the lockout period (31 vs 69, p = 0.041) and bolus adjustments (0 vs 25, p < 0.001) with the modified regimen.
-
To reduce the risk of tracheostomy tube blockage, a removable inner tube can be used. However, this will reduce the size of the lumen and will increase airflow resistance and work of breathing. The magnitude of this increase in workload is unknown. ⋯ The extra work of breathing imposed easily exceeded the normal total work of breathing. Our results will aid a risk-benefit analysis when deciding whether to use inner tubes. Selecting a larger tracheostomy tube is likely to aid weaning from mechanical ventilation.
-
Practice Guideline
Immediate post-anaesthesia recovery 2013: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.
1. After general, epidural or spinal anaesthesia, all patients should be recovered in a specially designated area (henceforth 'post-anaesthesia care unit', PACU) that complies with the standards and recommendations described in this document. 2. The anaesthetist must formally hand over the care of a patient to an appropriately trained and registered PACU practitioner. 3. ⋯ When critically ill patients are managed in a PACU because of bed shortages, the primary responsibility for the patient lies with the hospital's critical care team. The standard of nursing and medical care should be equal to that in the hospital's critical care units. Audit and critical incident reporting systems should be in place in all PACUs.