Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
The effect of continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block on unplanned postoperative visits and readmissions after foot surgery - a randomised, controlled study comparing day-care and inpatient management.
Regional anaesthesia has been shown to have several advantages over general anaesthesia in reducing the need for, and hence cost of, unscheduled outpatient visits or readmission to hospital. However, the benefit has not been evaluated in a direct comparison between day-care patients and inpatients. We randomly allocated 120 patients undergoing unilateral foot surgery to either inpatient (two-day postoperative stay) or day-care management under continuous regional anaesthesia, and compared the impact on unscheduled postoperative outpatient visits, readmissions to hospital and the associated costs. ⋯ We found no significant difference in the incidence of outpatient visits (3.3% day-care vs 5.0% inpatient, p = 0.640), readmissions (6.7% day-care vs 3.3% inpatient, p = 0.395) or complications between the two groups. Costs were also significantly lower in the day-care group (net difference €8011 (£6684; $10 986) per patient, p < 0.001). We conclude that continuous regional anaesthesia allows foot surgery to be performed as a day-care procedure more cheaply than in inpatients, without an increase in clinical complications.
-
To date, postoperative quality of recovery lacks a universally accepted definition and assessment technique. Current quality of recovery assessment tools vary in their development, breadth of assessment, validation, use of continuous vs dichotomous outcomes and focus on individual vs group recovery. They have progressed from identifying pure restitution of physiological parameters to multidimensional assessments of postoperative function and patient-focused outcomes. ⋯ A literature search identified 11 unique recovery assessment tools. The Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale assesses recovery in multiple domains, including physiological, nociceptive, emotive, activities of daily living, cognition and patient satisfaction. It addresses recovery over time and compares individual patient data with base line, thus describing resumption of capacities and is an acceptable method for identification of individual patient recovery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The effects of intra-operative dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain, side-effects and recovery in colorectal surgery.
In this double-blind, randomised study, 100 patients undergoing open or conventional laparoscopic colorectal surgery received an intra-operative loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg.kg(-1) followed by an infusion of 0.5 μg.kg(-1) .h(-1) , or a bolus and infusion of saline 0.9% of equivalent volume. Forty-six patients in the dexmedetomidine group and 50 in the saline group completed the study. ⋯ From the data obtained in this study, we calculated a number needed to treat for effective pain relief of 4. Intra-operative dexmedetomidine in colorectal surgery resulted in a reduction in resting pain scores, but there was no morphine-sparing effect or improvement in patients' recovery outcome measures.
-
The Anaconda™ system is used to deliver inhalational sedation in the intensive care unit in mainland Europe. The new Mirus™ system also uses a reflector like the Anaconda; however, it also identifies end-tidal concentrations from the gas flow, injects anaesthetics during early inspiration, controls anaesthetic concentrations automatically, and can be used with desflurane, which is not possible using the Anaconda. We tested the Mirus with desflurane in the laboratory. ⋯ Efficiency was > 80% and was also deemed to be acceptable, but only when delivering a low concentration of desflurane (≤ 1.8%). By modifying the reflector, we improved efficiency up to a concentration of 3.6%. The Mirus appears to be a promising new device for long-term sedation with desflurane on the intensive care unit, but efficiency must be improved before routine clinical use becomes affordable.
-
Concise guidelines are presented that recommend the method of choice for skin antisepsis before central neuraxial blockade. The Working Party specifically considered the concentration of antiseptic agent to use and its method of application. The advice presented is based on previously published guidelines, laboratory and clinical studies, case reports, and on the known properties of antiseptic agents.