Anaesthesia
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of the predictive performance of three pharmacokinetic models for propofol using measured values obtained during target-controlled infusion.
We compared the predictive performance of the existing Diprifusor and Schnider models, used for target-controlled infusion of propofol, with a new modification of the Diprifusor model (White) incorporating age and sex covariates. The bias and inaccuracy (precision) of each model were determined using computer simulation to replicate the infusion profiles in an earlier study of 41 patients undergoing surgery with propofol administered by target-controlled infusion and in which timed, measured blood propofol concentrations were available. ⋯ Temporal changes were such that with all three models, bias differed at induction and recovery. None of the models accounted fully for the extent of inter-individual variation in propofol clearance, but the improved performance with the White model suggests it has merit.
-
Assessment tools must be investigated for reliability, validity and feasibility before being implemented. In 2013, the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists introduced workplace-based assessments, including a direct observation of a procedural skills assessment tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of this assessment tool for ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. ⋯ Internal consistency was measured by correlation between 'total score' and 'overall performance' scale item (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). Construct validity was demonstrated by the 'total score' correlating with trainee experience (r = 0.51, p = 0.004). The mean time taken to complete assessments was 6 min 35 s.
-
Sleep deprivation is common among intensive care patients and may be associated with delirium. We investigated whether the implementation of a bundle of non-pharmacological interventions, consisting of environmental noise and light reduction designed to reduce disturbing patients during the night, was associated with improved sleep and a reduced incidence of delirium. The study was divided into two parts, before and after changing our practice. ⋯ In addition, the introduction of the care bundle led to a reduced incidence of delirium (55/167 (33%) before vs 24/171 (14%) after, p < 0.001), and less time spent in delirium (3.4 (1.4) days before vs 1.2 (0.9) days after, p = 0.021). Increases in sleep efficiency index were associated with a lower odds ratio of developing delirium (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.97). The introduction of an environmental noise and light reduction programme as a bundle of non-pharmacological interventions in the intensive care unit was effective in reducing sleep deprivation and delirium, and we propose a similar programme should be implemented more widely.
-
Editorial Comment
Quality and safety in healthcare revisited: a challenge accepted.