Anaesthesia
-
Letter Guideline
PROSPECT guideline for oncological breast surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.
Analgesic protocols used to treat pain after breast surgery vary significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on this topic and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after oncological breast surgery. A systematic review using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidance with procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. ⋯ Paravertebral block may be continued postoperatively using catheter techniques. Opioids should be reserved as rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. Research is needed to evaluate the role of novel regional analgesic techniques such as erector spinae plane or retrolaminar plane blocks combined with basic analgesics in an enhanced recovery setting.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The impact of fluid optimisation before induction of anaesthesia on hypotension after induction.
Intra-operative hypotension is a known predictor of adverse events and poor outcomes following major surgery. Hypotension often occurs on induction of anaesthesia, typically attributed to hypovolaemia and the haemodynamic effects of anaesthetic agents. We assessed the efficacy of fluid optimisation for reducing the incidence of hypotension on induction of anaesthesia. ⋯ Forty-two (30%) goal-directed fluid therapy patients underwent fluid optimisation after finding an intravascular fluid deficit via passive leg raise testing; 106 (75%) goal-directed fluid therapy and 112 (79%) standard fluid therapy patients met criteria for haemodynamic instability. There was no significant difference in the incidence of haemodynamic instability between the goal-directed fluid therapy and standard fluid therapy groups using absolute mean arterial pressure drop below 55 mmHg (p = 0.58) or using pre-surgical testing or pre-surgical mean arterial pressure values as baseline (p = 0.21, p = 0.89, respectively); however, the difference in the incidence of haemodynamic instability was significant using the operating theatre baseline mean arterial pressure (p = 0.004). We conclude that fluid optimisation before induction of general anaesthesia did not significantly impact haemodynamic instability.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The effect of intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine on quality of recovery in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy causes discomfort in the immediate postoperative period. This randomised controlled trial investigated if intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine, in addition to general anaesthesia, could be beneficial for the postoperative quality of recovery. One hundred and fifty-five patients were randomly allocated to an intervention group that received intrathecal 12.5 mg bupivacaine/300 μg morphine (20% dose reduction in patients > 75 years) or a control group receiving a subcutaneous sham injection and an intravenous loading dose of 0.1 mg.kg-1 morphine. ⋯ Moreover, the intervention group used less rescue medication. Pruritus was more severe in the intervention group; NRS 4 (1-7 [0-10]) vs. 0 (0-1 [0-10]), p = 0.000. We conclude that despite a modest increase in the incidence of pruritus, multimodal pain management with intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine remains a viable option for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
-
A three-stage Delphi survey process was undertaken to identify the quality indicators considered the most relevant to obstetric anaesthesia. The initial quality indicators assessed were derived from national peer-reviewed publications and were divided into service provision, service quality and clinical outcomes. A range of stakeholders were invited to participate and divided into three panels: obstetric anaesthetists; other maternity care health professionals; and women who had used maternity services. ⋯ These 11 indicators were presented to stakeholders; they were asked to vote for the five indicators they considered most relevant and useful for assessing and benchmarking the quality of obstetric anaesthesia provided. The indicators chosen were: the percentage of women who had an epidural/combined spinal-epidural for labour analgesia with accidental dural puncture; the presence of guidelines for the referral of patients to an anaesthetist for antenatal review; whether there are dedicated elective caesarean section lists; the availability of point-of-care testing for estimation of haemoglobin concentration; and the percentage of epidurals for labour analgesia that provided adequate pain relief within 45 min of the start of epidural insertion. These indicators may be used for quality improvement and national benchmarking to support the implementation of quality standards in obstetric anaesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Determining the effective pre-oxygenation interval in obstetric patients using high-flow nasal oxygen and standard flow rate facemask: a biased-coin up-down sequential allocation trial.
Using biased-coin sequential allocation, we sought to determine the effective time interval in 90% of healthy parturients to achieve a target endpoint end-tidal oxygen of ≥ 90% using standard flow rate facemask and high-flow nasal oxygen. Eighty healthy parturients were randomly assigned to standard facemask (n = 40) or high-flow nasal oxygen (n = 40) groups; half of the parturients in the high-flow nasal oxygen group also used a simple no-flow facemask to minimise air entrainment. The effective time interval for 90% of parturients to achieve the target endpoint for standard facemask was 3.6 min (95%CI 3.3-6.7 min), but could not be estimated for the high-flow nasal oxygen groups with or without an additional simple facemask, as eight minutes was insufficient to achieve the target endpoint for 55% and 92% of parturients, respectively. ⋯ After four minutes, the target endpoint was reached by 100% in the standard facemask, 80% in the high-flow nasal oxygen with simple facemask and 67% in the high-flow nasal oxygen groups. Beyond four minutes, there was no improvement in pre-oxygenation success using high-flow nasal oxygen. In conclusion, under the conditions of our study, the effective time interval for 90% of parturients to achieve an end-tidal oxygen ≥ 90% for standard flow rate facemask was estimated to be 3.6 min, but could not be estimated for high-flow nasal oxygen groups even after eight minutes.