Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Prevention of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: ephedrine infusion versus fluid preload.
We compared the efficacy of prophylactic ephedrine infusion over fluid preloading in prevention of maternal hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Forty-six women undergoing elective Caesarean section at term were allocated randomly to receive either intravenous fluid preloading with Hartmann's solution 20 ml.kg-1 (fluid group) or prophylactic intravenous ephedrine 0.25 mg.kg-1 (ephedrine group). Moderate hypotension was defined as > or = 20% reduction in systolic blood pressure and severe hypotension as > or = 30% reduction in systolic blood pressure. ⋯ Mean umbilical venous pH was higher in the ephedrine group than in the fluid group (7.33 vs. 7.29, p = 0.02) and the number of patients shivering was lower in the ephedrine group (2 vs. 9, p = 0.02). No difference was found between pre- and postspinal uterine artery pulsatility indices in either group. We conclude that prophylactic ephedrine infusion alone is at least as good as fluid preload alone in combating the hypotension associated with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The anti-emetic efficacy of a combination of ondansetron and droperidol.
The anti-emetic efficacy of a combination of ondansetron 8 mg with either droperidol 0.75 mg or 1.25 mg given prophylactically was studied in a randomised blinded trial of 94 female inpatients with a previous history of postoperative nausea and vomiting and scheduled to have laparoscopic surgery. A standardised general anaesthetic technique was used for all patients. The mean estimated risk of postoperative sickness according to predictive patient characteristics was 65% for both treatment groups. ⋯ No serious adverse events were observed. Ondansetron in combination with droperidol 0.75 mg resulted in less drowsiness than in combination with 1.25 mg (p = 0.03). In conclusion, a prophylactic combination treatment of ondansetron 8 mg with a small dose of droperidol was clinically effective and well tolerated for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery in patients with a high probability of nausea and vomiting.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Addition of adrenaline to pethidine for epidural analgesia after caesarean section.
We have investigated the addition of adrenaline to epidural pethidine for postoperative analgesia in 40 patients after Caesarean section. In a randomised, double-blind study, patients received pethidine 25 mg with adrenaline 50 micrograms (adrenaline group, n = 20) or pethidine 25 mg without adrenaline (plain group, n = 18) epidurally at the first request for postoperative analgesia. ⋯ Visual analogue scale pain scores in the first 30 min after injection and onset of analgesia, defined by the time for pain scores to decrease by 50%, were similar between groups. Addition of adrenaline to epidural pethidine has advantages for analgesia after Caesarean section.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of the infusion pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium, the 1R-cis 1'R-cis isomer of atracurium, with atracurium besylate in healthy patients.
We have compared the pharmacokinetics of cisatracurium with atracurium when given by bolus dose followed by continuous infusion. Twenty healthy patients were anaesthetised with thiopentone, midazolam, fentanyl and 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Ten patients (Group C) were randomly allocated to receive cisatracurium 0.1 mg.kg-1 and 10 patients (Group A) were given atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1. ⋯ The different isomer groups of atracurium have different pharmacokinetics, the trans-trans group having the highest clearance (1440 ml.min-1) and the cis-cis group the lowest (499 ml.min-1). The clearance of cisatracurium (425 ml.min-1) is less than that of cis-cis atracurium and its elimination half-life is longer (34.9 min and 21.9 min, respectively). The plasma concentration of laudanosine after cisatracurium was one-fifth of that after atracurium.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
A comparison of intercuff and single cuff techniques of intravenous regional anaesthesia using 0.5% prilocaine mixed with technetium 99m-labelled BRIDA.
Intravenous regional anaesthesia of the upper limb is a widely used technique first described by Bier in 1908. The exact site of action of injected local anaesthetic has not been determined. We have performed intravenous regional anaesthesia on volunteers using prilocaine mixed with technetium 99m-labelled 2,4,6 trimethyl-3-bromo iminodiacetic acid. ⋯ The onset of action was similar for both techniques. The local anaesthetic was mainly retained in the antecubital fossa in both techniques but in the 'normal' technique, the local anaesthetic subsequently showed some retrograde spread. This would suggest that the main site of action of local anaesthetic used for intravenous regional anaesthesia is the larger nerves in the vicinity of the antecubital fossa.