Der Anaesthesist
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
[Circulatory reactions under spinal anesthesia. The catheter technique versus the single dose procedure].
Life-threatening cardiovascular complications are a serious risk even for healthy patients during spinal/epidural anaesthesia. The incidence of fatal cardiovascular complications for epidural anaesthesia is 1:10000, for spinal anaesthesia 1:7000. In contrast, general anaesthesia has an overall mortality of only 1:28000. Administration of IV fluids to minimise the haemodynaemic reactions of beginning sympatholysis is not always sufficient. In this study, we examined whether fractionated application of local anaesthetics via a spinal catheter would provide better haemodynamic stability. ⋯ With the use of CSA, the haemodynamic effects of sympatholysis can be minimised. This method thus has advantages, especially for high-risk cardiovascular patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Transcranial doppler sonography. Effect of sevoflurane in comparison to isoflurane].
Using transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD), we studied the effects of sevoflurane compared to equipotent doses of isoflurane on blood-flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) before, during, and after general anaesthesia. In random order, 30 patients received sevoflurane (n = 15) or isoflurane (n = 15) given in stepwise-increasing doses of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MAC in oxygen/air (FiO2 = 0.5). Oxygen/air was then replaced by oxygen/nitrous oxide 33%/65% with decreasing doses (1.5, 1.0, 0.5 MAC) of sevoflurane or isoflurane. During each step, ventilation was controlled to provide first normocapnia (end-tidal pCO2 = 38 mmHg) and then hypocapnia (end-tidal pCO2 = 27 mmHg). MCA blood-flow velocity and pulsatility, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature were recorded simultaneously at the end of each period. For statistical analysis, within-group comparison was made by one-way ANOVA. Differences between groups were determined by two-way analysis of variance. Age, weight, and height of the patients were compared using Student's t-test; P < 0.05 was considered significant. ⋯ We conclude from our TCD data that equipotent doses of sevoflurane and isoflurane comparably affect cerebral perfusion, especially when nitrous oxide is given simultaneously.