Der Anaesthesist
-
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[S-(+)-Ketamine and circulation].
The S-(+) isomer of ketamine has about twice the analgesic potency of the clinically used racemic mixture. Therefore, the known side effects may be reduced when one-half of the usual dose is administered. Several prospective, randomised, and double-blinded studies have been performed to assess whether the S-(+) isomer of ketamine is superior to the racemic mixture with respect to circulatory side effects. ⋯ One patient in the S-(+)-ketamine group showed severe arterial hypertension and tachycardia after induction of anaesthesia and was withdrawn from the study. With respect to haemodynamic changes, the pharmacodynamic effects of ketamine racemate and S-(+)-ketamine are comparable. Therefore, it can be concluded that neither ketamine nor S-(+)-ketamine should be used in patients who suffer, e.g., from arterial hypertension and coronary artery disease.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[The preemptive action of ketoprofen. Randomized, double-blind study with gynecologic operations].
Ketoprofen exerts its clinical effect by inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, but also acts as an NMDA-receptor antagonist by means of the kynurenic acid. Based on ketoprofen's supposed central mechanism of analgesia, we expected a preemptive effect, which was assessed by the present study. ⋯ Ketoprofen is an effective post-operative analgesic in combination with an opioid, but has no preemptive effect according to the results of this study.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Combined 3-in-1 sciatic block. Prilocaine 500 mg vs. 650 mg].
The objective of the study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of increasing the dosage of prilocaine for a combined 3-in-1/sciatic nerve block from 500 to 650 mg (open study with 29 patients compared with 30 patients from a former study) and to validate these findings in a second stage (randomised study comparing two groups of 30 patients each). Not only was clinical effectiveness improved by increasing the dose to 650 mg, but methaemoglobinaemia and toxicity were not relevant problems. With the higher dosage, development of the block was slightly faster (onset and completion); there were fewer unsatisfactory blocks; and clinically relevant plasma levels of methaemoglobin did not occur.