Shock : molecular, cellular, and systemic pathobiological aspects and therapeutic approaches : the official journal the Shock Society, the European Shock Society, the Brazilian Shock Society, the International Federation of Shock Societies
-
The sympathetic nervous system plays an important role in the initial response to sepsis. This response enables the host to respond to invading pathogens; however, prolonged activation can become pathological. The potential for unregulated sympathetic tone to become detrimental in the septic patient has fueled interest in the role and impact of sympathetic manipulation, including the selective inhibition of sympathetic tone to return and augment vascular reactivity. ⋯ Theory and basic science evidence supports the use of α agonists in the septic population. The clinical evidence shedding light on this topic is limited and confounded by intention or trial design. Future evidence should focus on adjuvant therapy in patients progressing to or at high risk of shock development.
-
In addition to their well-known role as the cellular mediators of immunity, key other roles have been identified for neutrophils during septic shock. Importantly, neutrophils indeed play a critical role in the recently described immunothrombosis concept and in septic shock-induced coagulopathy. Septic shock is one of the most severe forms of infection, characterized by an inadequate host response to the pathogenic organism. ⋯ Neutrophils thus stand at the interface between hemostasis and immunity, called immunothrombosis. The present review will develop a cellular approach of septic shock pathophysiology focusing on neutrophils as key players of septic shock-induced vascular cell dysfunction and of the host response, associating immunity and hemostasis. We will therefore first develop the role of neutrophils in the interplay between innate and adaptive immunity, and will then highlight recent advances in our understanding of immunothrombosis septic shock-induced coagulopathy.
-
Sepsis, which kills over 200,000 patients and costs over $20 billion in the United States alone, presents a constant but preventable challenge in the healthcare system. Among the more challenging problems that it presents is misdiagnosis due to conflation with other inflammatory processes, as its mechanisms are identical to those of other inflammatory states. Unfortunately, current biomarker tests can only assess the severity and mortality risk of each case, whereas no single test exists that can predict sepsis prior to the onset of symptoms for the purpose of pre-emptive care and monitoring. ⋯ Such a test would vastly improve patient outcomes and quality of life, prevent complications for sepsis survivors, and prevent hospital readmissions, saving the American healthcare system money. This review summarizes the current use of sepsis biomarkers to prognosticate morbidity and mortality, and rejects the current single-biomarker and even combination biomarker tests as non-specific and inaccurate for current patient needs/pro-inflammatory cytokines, general markers of inflammation, and proteins specific to myeloid cells (and therefore to infection) are discussed. Ultimately, the review suggests a three-biomarker test of procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) to diagnose sepsis before the onset of symptoms.