Shock : molecular, cellular, and systemic pathobiological aspects and therapeutic approaches : the official journal the Shock Society, the European Shock Society, the Brazilian Shock Society, the International Federation of Shock Societies
-
Trauma remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups in the United States. Hemorrhagic shock and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are major causes of preventable death in trauma. Initial treatment involves fluid resuscitation to improve the intravascular volume. ⋯ In this review, we discuss the role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and pharmacologic agents that inhibit them (HDACis). We also highlight the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action of HDACis in hemorrhagic shock, TBI, polytrauma, and sepsis. With further investigation and translation, HDACis have the potential to be a high-impact adjunctive therapy to traditional resuscitation.
-
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) contributes to nearly 1 in 3 injury-related deaths in the United States and accounts for a substantial public health burden and cost. The current literature reports that physiologic responses in the gastrointestinal system after TBI include, but are not limited to, epithelial barrier dysfunction, microbiota changes, and immunologic transformations. Recent evidence suggests gut alterations after TBI modify the homeostasis of the bidirectional gut-microbiota-brain axis, resulting in altered immune responses in the periphery and the brain. ⋯ Although attention to the gut-brain-microbiota axis has been increasing in the literature, the precise mechanisms underlying the changes observed after TBI remain unclear. The purpose of this review are to describe our current understanding regarding alterations to the gut-microbiota-brain axis after TBI, highlight the pathophysiologic changes involved, and evaluate how these variations modify healing in the CNS or even contribute to secondary injury. We also discuss current investigations into potential medical therapies directed at the gut-microbiota-brain axis, which might offer improved outcomes after TBI.
-
Meta Analysis
Does Fenoldopam Protect Kidney in Cardiac Surgery? A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis.
To assess the benefits and harms of fenoldopam for nephroprotective effects in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. ⋯ Low-dose dopamine offers transient improvements in renal physiology, but no good evidence shows that it offers important clinical benefits to patients with or at risk for acute renal failure.Among patients treated with fenoldopam, there was a decrease in AKI and an increased incidence of hypotension, had no significant effect on RRT or mortality. Given that most studies were small and the definition of AKI was variable between studies, there is not enough evidence to support the systematic use of fenoldopam in cardiac surgery.
-
Review
« Immunosuppression » is Inappropriately Qualifying the Immune Status of Septic and Sirs Patients.
Immunosuppression is the most commonly used concept to qualify the immune status of patients with either sterile systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis. In this review we attempt to demonstrate that the concept of immunosuppression is an oversimplification of the complex anti-inflammatory response that occurs in patients dealing with a severe sterile or infectious insult. ⋯ This juxtaposition illustrates that there is no global defect. The mechanisms called reprogramming or trained innate immunity are probably aimed at preventing a generalized deleterious inflammatory reaction, and work to maintain the defense mechanisms at their due levels.
-
Uncontrolled bleeding is the main cause of the potential preventable death in trauma patients. Accordingly, we reviewed all the existing scores for massive transfusion posttraumatic hemorrhage and summarized their characteristics, thus making it easier for the reader to have a global view of these scores-how they were created, their accuracy and to which population they apply. ⋯ The current prevailing practice that is best described as institutional or provider centered should be supplemented with score-based protocol with auditing and monitoring tools to refine it. This review summarizes the current scoring models in predicting the need for MT in civilian and military trauma. Several questions remain open; i.e., do we need to develop new score, merge scores, modify scores, or adopt existing score for certain trauma setting?