Journal of the American College of Surgeons
-
Review Meta Analysis
Impact of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Relative to Its Design and Intended Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis.
The aim of this study was to identify what parts of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) are working, what can be done to make it more effective, and to determine if it achieved its intended effect relative to its design and intended use. ⋯ The WHO SSC positively impacts the things it was explicitly designed to address and does not positively impact things it was not explicitly designed for.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Primary Operation with Systemic Therapy in Patients with de Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer: 10-Year Follow-Up of Protocol MF07-01 Randomized Clinical Trial.
The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) data of patients diagnosed with de novo stage IV breast cancer (BC) who received locoregional treatment (LRT) over a 10-year follow-up. ⋯ Patients with a diagnosis of de novo stage IV BC who underwent LRT followed by ST had a 14% higher chance of OS by the end of the 10-year follow-up compared with the patients who received only ST. The longer study follow-up revealed that LRT should be presented to patients when discussing treatment options.
-
Retained surgical items are a serious human error. Surgical sponges account for 70% of retained surgical items. To prevent retained surgical sponges, it is important to establish a system that can identify errors and avoid the occurrence of adverse events. To date, no computer-aided diagnosis software specialized for detecting retained surgical sponges has been reported. We developed a software program that enables easy and effective computer-aided diagnosis of retained surgical sponges with high sensitivity and specificity using the technique of deep learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence. ⋯ Software with high sensitivity for diagnosis of retained surgical sponges was developed successfully.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Long-Term Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive vs Open Distal Pancreatectomy in the LEOPARD Randomized Trial.
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) shortens time to functional recovery and improves 30-day quality of life (QoL), as compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for nonmalignant disease. The impact of MIDP on QoL, cosmetic satisfaction, and overall major complications beyond 1-year follow-up is currently unknown. ⋯ More than 3 years after distal pancreatectomy, no improvement in QALYs and overall QoL was seen after MIDP, whereas cosmetic satisfaction was higher after MIDP as compared with ODP.