Journal of the American College of Surgeons
-
Lifelong follow-up after metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) is necessary to monitor for patient outcomes and nutritional status. However, many patients do not routinely follow up with their MBS team. We studied what prompted MBS patients to seek bariatric care after being lost to follow-up and the subsequent treatments they received. ⋯ This study highlights RWG as the most common reason for patients after MBS seeking to re-establish care with the MBS team. SG had a higher rate of revision MBS than RYGB, whereas endoscopic interventions were performed more frequently in the RYGB group. AOM, especially GLP-1 drugs, were more effective in RYGB patients.
-
Incisional hernia (IH) is a known complication after colorectal surgery. Despite advances in minimally invasive surgery, colorectal surgery still requires extraction sites for specimen retrieval, increasing the likelihood of postoperative IH development.The objective of this study is to determine the effect of specimen extraction site on the rate of IH after minimally invasive right-sided colectomy for patients with available imaging. ⋯ Patients who undergo Pfannenstiel specimen extraction have a lower risk of IH development compared with those who undergo midline specimen extraction.
-
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the standard of care for the treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI) requiring intervention. Data suggests that low grade BTAI (Grade 1 [intimal tears] or Grade 2 [intramural hematoma]) will resolve spontaneously if treated with non operative management (NOM) alone. There has been no comparison specifically between the use of NOM vs. TEVAR for low grade BTAI. We hypothesize that these low-grade injuries can be safely managed with NOM alone. ⋯ NOM alone is safe and appropriate management for low grade BTAIs, with lower mortality and decreased rates of complications when compared to routine initial TEVAR.