Current opinion in critical care
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Aug 2018
ReviewNutritional support in patients with extracorporeal life support and ventricular assist devices.
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) including venovenous and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VAD) provide mechanical pulmonary and circulatory support, respectively, in patients with acute pulmonary or cardiovascular failure. This review discusses recently published data regarding specific topics of nutritional support in patients with ECLS and VAD. ⋯ Despite the exponential use of ECLS and VAD over the last decade, the role of nutrition on clinical outcome in this patient population remains an important but yet underinvestigated field.
-
To provide an overview of recent findings concerning refeeding syndrome (RFS) among critically ill patients and recommendations for daily practice. ⋯ RFS is a potentially life-threatening condition induced by initiation of feeding after a period of starvation. Although a uniform definition is lacking, most definitions comprise a complex constellation of laboratory markers (i.e. hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia) or clinical symptoms, including cardiac and pulmonary failure. Recent studies show that low caloric intake results in lower mortality rates in critically ill RFS patients compared with RFS patients on full nutritional support. Therefore, standard monitoring of RFS-markers (especially serum phosphate) and caloric restriction when RFS is diagnosed should be considered. Furthermore, standard therapy with thiamin and electrolyte supplementation is essential.
-
Curr Opin Crit Care · Aug 2018
ReviewLess or more hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
Hemodynamic investigations are required in patients with shock to identify the type of shock, to select the most appropriate treatments and to assess the patient's response to the selected therapy. We discuss how to select the most appropriate hemodynamic monitoring techniques in patients with shock as well as the future of hemodynamic monitoring. ⋯ The use of echocardiography should be initially encouraged in patients with shock to identify the type of shock and to select the most appropriate therapy. The use of more invasive hemodynamic monitoring techniques should be discussed on an individualized basis.
-
Temporary circulatory support (TCS) with short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices is increasingly used as a salvage therapy for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. This article provides an overview of current devices, their indications and management, and discusses results of recent case series and trials. ⋯ TCS have become the cornerstone of the management of patients with cardiogenic shock, although the evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. VA-ECMO is considered the first-line option, with a growing number of accepted and emerging indications. Randomized clinical trials are now needed to determine the respective place of different MCS devices in cardiogenic shock treatment strategies.
-
There are limited vasoactive options to utilize for patients presenting with vasodilatory shock. This review discusses vasoactive agents in vasodilatory, specifically, septic shock and focuses on angiotensin II as a novel, noncatecholamine agent and describes its efficacy, safety, and role in the armamentarium of vasoactive agents utilized in this patient population. ⋯ With the approval and release of angiotensin II, a new vasoactive agent is now available to utilize in these patients. Overall, the treatment for vasodilatory shock should not be a one-size fits all approach and should be individualized to each patient. A multimodal approach, integrating angiotensin II as a noncatecholamine option should be considered for patients presenting with this disease state.