Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
-
National organizations have called for routine collection of data on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) in clinical settings to track access to and quality of care provided to sexual and gender minority patients to improve health outcomes. However, there are limited data on this implementation for among adolescent populations. ⋯ This study identified incomplete data collection in SOGI documentation among adolescents receiving medical and mental health services in SBHCs.
-
Representation of benefits and harms associated with specific interventions in an understandable and comparable way is crucial for informed decision making that clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to enhance. Therefore, we investigated how statements concerning the effects of interventions considered and described benefits and harms, magnitude of effect and its uncertainty, numeric and non-numeric information, and outcomes in Finnish CPGs. ⋯ In the Finnish CPGs, the statements were rarely framed with both absolute and relative numeric measures of an intervention's effect. Harms were rarely reported with a grade indicating the level of evidence. The users of CPGs would benefit from more consistent and understandable framing of statements considering both benefits and harms of interventions.
-
Empathic attitudes and behaviours of midwives directly affect obstetric outcomes. The study aims to examine the effect of empathy training on the empathic communication skills of midwives and the childbirth satisfaction of primiparous mothers. ⋯ The empathy training improved both the empathy skills of midwives, and translated to improved maternal satisfaction with birth among their mothers. It is recommended to increase the number of follow-ups to evaluate the long-term effect of empathy training.
-
Support for the concept of respect for first-person informed consent and patient autonomy, including the negative right of patients to refuse unwanted interventions has grown, but does not generally include a positive right of patients to receive whatever treatment they request or demand without constraint. Despite this, health-care providers in both Canada and the United States are guilty of providing, in their own opinions, futile or probably futile treatments at the request of patients or their substitute decision-makers. ⋯ The initial hypothesis of the researcher in this study was that SDM is not well understood by physicians, and that this lack of understanding, combined with other factors to be discussed in the full text, may result in patients receiving ethically-inappropriate treatment. Results suggest support for this hypothesis, and that SDM should be more closely examined if it is to be pursued as a method of decision making.