British journal of anaesthesia
-
Cusum analysis is a statistical technique to distinguish deviations from an acceptable failure rate. The progress of anaesthetic trainees learning four practical procedures (obstetric extradural anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia, central venous cannulation and arterial cannulation) was monitored from their first attempt using cusum analysis. Suitable acceptable and unacceptable failure rates for each procedure were chosen by consultant anaesthetists. ⋯ Two records of central venous cannulation were inconclusive. Some records showed variable failure rates which were sometimes associated with lack of practice or a change in technique. Cusum analysis can be used to monitor training in practical procedures and as a continuous audit of quality of clinical practice.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Comparison of the effects of sub-hypnotic concentrations of propofol and halothane on the acute ventilatory response to hypoxia.
To compare the effects of sub-anaesthetic concentrations of propofol and halothane on the respiratory control system, we have studied the acute ventilatory response to isocapnic hypoxia (AHVR) in 12 adults with and without three different concentrations of propofol and halothane. Target doses for propofol were 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 of the effective plasma concentration (EC50 = 8.1 micrograms ml-1). Target doses for halothane were 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC = 0.77%). ⋯ The decline in AHVR with increasing dose for both drugs was statistically significant (ANOVA, P < 0.001); there was no significant difference between the two drugs with respect to this decline. Normoxic ventilation with propofol declined from 13.2 (1.6) litre min-1 (0.01 EC50) to 8.3 (0.9 litre min-1 (0.26 EC50), and with halothane declined from 13.5 (2.0) litre min-1 (0 MAC) to 11.8 (1.6) litre min-1 (0.2 MAC). This was significant for both drugs (ANOVA, P < 0.001).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Cerebrospinal fluid progesterone in pregnant women.
To assess the possible relationship between an increase in progesterone concentration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and enhancement of spread of spinal anaesthesia, we have measured CSF progesterone concentrations in 134 patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric amethocaine 8 mg. Patients were allocated to one of five groups according to the gestational period: non-pregnant group (n = 13), first trimester group (8-12 weeks, n = 16), second trimester group (13-24 weeks, n = 18), third trimester group (25-36 weeks, n = 38) and term group (37-41 weeks, n = 49). Progesterone concentration in CSF was higher in the third trimester and term groups than in the non-pregnant, first trimester and second trimester groups. ⋯ Although an increase in CSF progesterone concentration in the second trimester group was similar in magnitude to that observed in the first trimester group, enhanced spread of spinal anaesthesia, comparable in magnitude with that observed in the term group, occurred in the second trimester group. There was no significant correlation between CSF progesterone concentration and spread of spinal anaesthesia in any of the groups. These data suggest that not only a minimum level of progesterone in CSF but also a certain duration of exposure to elevated CSF progesterone concentrations may be necessary for enhancement of spread of spinal anaesthesia, and that values of CSF progesterone concentration do not correlate directly with enhancement of spread of spinal anaesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effect of digital pressure on the neurovascular sheath during perivascular axillary block.
We have assessed prospectively the influence of digital pressure on the effectiveness of perivascular axillary block using a catheter technique in two groups of patients. Ninety-eight patients received axillary injections of 2% mepivacaine with adrenaline 20 ml mixed with contrast agent 20 ml. During injection firm digital pressure was applied either on the neurovascular sheath (group 1) or 6-8 cm below it (group 2). ⋯ There were no statistically significant differences in proximal flow of mepivacaine or in the success rate of the block between the groups. Signs of flow obstruction by the head of the humerus were seen in only eight patients. In the majority of patients local anaesthetic spread above the coracoid process, which increased the success rate of the block, but did not guarantee an effective block.