British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Ketorolac, diclofenac and ketoprofen are equally efficacious for pain relief after total hip replacement surgery.
We have compared the efficacy of ketorolac 30 mg i.v. followed by infusion at a rate of 90 mg/15.5 h, with that of diclofenac 75 mg followed by infusion of 75 mg/15.5 h or ketoprofen 100 mg followed by infusion of 100 mg/15.5 h, on postoperative pain in 85 patients after hip replacement surgery under spinal anaesthesia in a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Supplementary analgesia was administered during the 16-h postoperative period with bolus doses of fentanyl delivered by a patient-controlled analgesia system. ⋯ Median VAS scores were low over the entire study in each group and there was no significant difference between groups. No serious adverse events were recorded.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Saline as an alternative to air for filling the laryngeal mask airway cuff.
We have assessed a new method to evacuate saline completely from the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) cuff and tested the hypothesis that intracuff pressures, fibreoptic position and oropharyngeal leak pressures are similar for saline compared with air during nitrous oxide-oxygen anaesthesia. Eight size 4 LMA were inflated with saline 30 ml. After syringe evacuation, median residual weight was 0.56 (range 0.24-0.98) g; after additional manual cuff squeezing it was 0.26 (0.21-0.35) g; and after drying for 12 h at 60 degrees C with the valve open it was -0.02 (-0.05-0.04) g. ⋯ Oropharyngeal leak pressures were similar between groups. We conclude that the saline-inflated LMA cuff was reliably emptied and more stable in terms of intracuff pressures and possibly fibreoptic position. Filling the LMA cuff with saline is a viable option during laser surgery to the airway.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
An open, randomized comparison of alfentanil, remifentanil and alfentanil followed by remifentanil in anaesthesia for craniotomy.
We studied 52 adults undergoing elective craniotomy, allocated randomly to one of three opioid treatments: alfentanil 50 micrograms kg-1 followed by 0.833 microgram kg-1 min-1 until dural closure (group Alf.); alfentanil 50 micrograms kg-1 followed by 0.833 microgram kg-1 min-1 for 2 h, then remifentanil 0.25 microgram kg-1 min-1 (group Alf.-Remi.); or remifentanil 1 microgram kg-1 followed by 0.5 microgram kg-1 min-1 reducing to 0.25 microgram kg-1 min-1 after craniotomy (group Remi.). Anaesthesia was maintained with infusion of propofol and 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Infusions of propofol and remifentanil were stopped at head bandaging. ⋯ Times to tracheal extubation and obey commands were similar in all groups. In all patients in group Alf.-Remi. and group Remi., the trachea was extubated 27 min from the end of anaesthesia; three patients in group Alf. were slower to recover. Use of analgesia in the recovery room and time to transfer to the neurosurgical unit were similar in the three groups.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
High-dose ondansetron regimen vs droperidol for morphine patient-controlled analgesia.
We have performed a randomized, double-blind study comparing droperidol and high-dose ondansetron mixed with morphine for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). To detect a reduction in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting from 55% to 20% with a power of 80% at the P < 0.05 level, 29 patients per group were required. We studied 60 healthy women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, anaesthetized using a standard technique. ⋯ In group D, 24 patients did not vomit compared with 23 in group O. The only significant difference between the groups was increased morphine consumption in the ondansetron group up until 12 h after operation (P < 0.05), but by 24 h this difference was not significant. The ondansetron regimen was more expensive (at local prices) by a factor of 27, and our results suggested no clinical advantage over droperidol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Does speed of intrathecal injection affect the distribution of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine?
We have evaluated the influence of speed of intrathecal injection on lateral distribution of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. We studied 60 patients undergoing lower limb surgery who were placed in the lateral position with the operative side in the dependent position. After dural puncture (25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle), the needle aperture was turned towards the dependent side and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 8 mg was injected randomly at a rate of 0.02 ml s-1 (group slow, n = 30) or 0.25 ml s-1 (group fast, n = 30). ⋯ There were no differences between the groups. Forty-five minutes after patients were turned to the supine position, spinal anaesthesia was unilateral in 17 patients in group slow (56%) and in 13 patients in group fast (43%). We conclude that using extremely low speeds for intrathecal injection were not clinically advantageous in obtaining unilateral spinal anaesthesia.