British journal of anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a randomized trial of the Airway Scope and the GlideScope.
The GlideScope (Verathon Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) and Airway Scope (Hoya Corp., Tokyo, Japan) have both been used for difficult airway management, including in patients with cervical spine pathology. The Airway Scope's disposable blade has a tube channel to guide tracheal tube insertion through the glottis. Our hypothesis is that this tube guidance system improves the ease of tracheal intubation compared with the GlideScope, which does not have a tube guiding system. We tested this hypothesis in a randomized comparison of the two videolaryngoscopes in patients whose cervical spines were immobilized. ⋯ These results suggest that the Airway Scope's tube guide system enables more rapid tracheal intubation compared with the GlideScope in patients with cervical spine immobilization.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists.
The McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope might reduce the incidence of unexpected difficult tracheal intubation. If it also performs as well as a standard laryngoscope during uncomplicated intubations, there would be an argument for the McGrath to become the laryngoscope of choice in higher risk settings, such as rapid sequence induction by inexperienced anaesthetists. Therefore, we compared the McGrath and the Macintosh laryngoscopes during routine tracheal intubation performed by inexperienced anaesthetists. ⋯ There were no advantages to using the McGrath laryngoscope for uncomplicated tracheal intubation and duration of intubation was longer, so it should not be used as a first-line laryngoscope instrument by inexperienced anaesthetists.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Analgesic effectiveness of ropivacaine 0.2% vs 0.4% via an ultrasound-guided C5-6 root/superior trunk perineural ambulatory catheter.
In this prospective, randomized, triple-blinded study, we tested the hypothesis that a 48 h continuous C5-6 root/superior trunk patient-controlled infusion of ropivacaine 0.4% would provide superior analgesia after shoulder surgery compared with the same infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%. ⋯ After major shoulder surgery, ropivacaine 0.2% at 2 ml h(-1) with on-demand 5 ml boluses administered via an ultrasound-guided C5-6 root/superior trunk perineural catheter produces similar analgesia, but higher patient satisfaction compared with ropivacaine 0.4%.
-
McDonnell highlights the differences in managing the collapsed parturient, namely:
- Need to prevent aortocaval compression.
- Early securing of the airway.
- Rapid perimortem Caesarean delivery.
- Likelihood of a non-cardiac/pregnancy cause.
The two cases presented include arrest due to ruptured uterus and arrest possibly due to iatrogenic magnesium overdose. Both resulted in favorable, though not perfect, outcomes for mother and baby.
The need for delivery suite ‘perimortem cesarean section packs’ is also discussed, as well as the use of regular simulation training.
summary -
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A randomized prospective study comparing two flexible epidural catheters for labour analgesia.
Previous studies evaluating stiff epidural catheters found that the three-holed design provided superior labour analgesia compared with an end-holed design. This was believed due to improved medication distribution. Recently, flexible epidural catheters with both designs have been shown to be superior to the stiff epidural catheters. We investigated the success of labour analgesia comparing the flexible three-holed with the flexible end-holed epidural catheter. ⋯ There were no differences in the initial analgesia success rate, complications, or labour analgesia between end-hole vs multi-hole flexible epidural catheters.