Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of three concentrations of simplex lidocaine in local anesthesia for inguinal hernia mesh-repairs.
The aim of the present randomized clinical study was to assess the efficacy of simplex lidocaine in local anesthesia for inguinal hernia mesh-repairs, compare analgesia of three different concentrations of lidocaine, and explore use of lower concentrations of lidocaine in local anesthesia for inguinal hernia mesh-repairs. ⋯ The local anesthesia technique was good with lidocaine alone in local anesthesia for inguinal hernia mesh-repairs. A concentration of 3.3 mg/mL lidocaine provided similar analgesia as 5 or 8 mg/mL lidocaine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
One-year results of a prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP).
A low rate of chronic pain and maximum postoperative comfort are the main goals today in inguinal hernia repair. This four-arm randomised trial compares these parameters after laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) with a standard heavyweight mesh (HW), a pure middleweight polypropylene mesh (MW), a lightweight composite polypropylene mesh (LW), or a titanised lightweight mesh (TLW). The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of chronic pain of any severity at the site of hernia repair at 1 year. ⋯ Compared to HW mesh, the use of MW, LW, and TLW meshes for laparoscopic hernia repair did not significantly affect rate of chronic pain, but seemed to improve early postoperative convalescence. No difference was found between middleweight pure polypropylene (MW), composite lightweight (LW), or titanised lightweight polypropylene (TLW) meshes.