Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
-
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established adjunctive surgical intervention to treat poorly controlled motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Both surgical targets (the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus) have proven equally efficacious in treating motor symptoms but unique differences may exist in effects on nonmotor symptoms. Sleep dysfunction, a common disabling symptom in PD, has only been examined directly in the subthalamic target, demonstrating some beneficial changes in sleep quality. We aimed to explore sleep changes after pallidal stimulation; hypothesizing similar benefits would be seen. ⋯ In this small pilot trial, pallidal DBS failed to demonstrate statistically significant improvements in sleep metrics postimplantation but did reveal improving trends in several PSG measures including sleep efficiency and latency to sleep onset as well as sleep survey scores. A larger, blinded clinical trial is needed to more definitively determine whether pallidal DBS may benefit sleep.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Motor Cortex Reorganization and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Pain-A Methodological Study.
Somatotopic reorganization of primary motor cortex (M1) has been described in several neurological conditions associated with chronic pain. We hypothesized that such reorganization impacts on the mechanisms of M1 stimulation induced analgesia and may either compromise the treatment effect of or provide an alternative target site for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The aim of the study was to compare pain relief following rTMS of the standard motor "hotspot" with that of the reorganized area. ⋯ Cortical reorganization may provide a more effective stimulation target for rTMS in some individuals with neuropathic pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Duration Dependent Effects of Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation (tPCS) Indexed by Electroencephalography.
To explore the duration of tPCS after effects given different durations of stimulation on power and interhemispheric coherence of the EEG frequency bands. Our hypothesis was that longer tPCS duration would induce a differential effect on the EEG analysis and a longer duration of after effects on the EEG frequency bands. ⋯ These results evidence the nonlinear relationship between the stimulation duration and the tPCS after effects, suggesting the presence of homeostatic mechanisms.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Clinical Outcomes of 1 kHz Subperception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Implanted Patients With Failed Paresthesia-Based Stimulation: Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Pain relief via spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has historically revolved around producing paresthesia to replace pain, with success measured by the extent of paresthesia-pain overlap. In a recent murine study, by Shechter et al., showed the superior efficacy of high frequency SCS (1 kHz and 10 kHz) at inhibiting the effects of mechanical hypersensitivity compared to sham or 50 Hz stimulation. In the same study, authors report there were no differences in efficacy between 1 kHz and 10 kHz delivered at subperception stimulation strength (80% of motor threshold). Therefore, we designed a randomized, 2 × 2 crossover study of low frequency supra-perception SCS vs. subperception SCS at 1 kHz frequency in order to test whether subperception stimulation at 1 kHz was sufficient to provide effective pain relief in human subjects. ⋯ Out of 22 subjects that completed the study, 21 subjects (95%) reported improvements in average, best, and worst pain NPRS scores. All NPRS scores were significantly lower with subperception stimulation compared to paresthesia-based stimulation (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). As with NPRS scores, the treatment effect of subperception stimulation was significantly greater than that of paresthesia based stimulation on ODI scores (p = 3.9737 × 10(-5) ) and PGIC scores (p = 3.0396 × 10(-5) ).
-
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is rapidly expanding therapy for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain. Although technical issues such as battery life and lead migration have been well studied and improved, little is known about the incidence and management of inadvertent dural puncture and consequent headache. ⋯ Dural puncture during SCS device placement and can result in a PDPH that is severe and refractory to conservative modes of therapy. Even in the presence of hardware, EBP performed with meticulous aseptic technique was found to be safe and efficacious.