Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Jul 2011
Multicenter Study Comparative StudySpinal anesthesia failure after local anesthetic injection into cerebrospinal fluid: a multicenter prospective analysis of its incidence and related risk factors in 1214 patients.
Different mechanisms have been proposed to explain spinal anesthesia failure even after LA injection into the subarachnoid space. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to assess the incidence of spinal anesthesia failure, excluding technical problems, and then to suggest independent factors leading to failure. ⋯ The results of this study showed that the incidence of spinal anesthesia failure was 3.2%. The number of puncture attempts at 3 or more and the absence of adjuvant medication associated with local anesthetic were independent factors associated with the increased risk of failure. The failure of spinal anesthesia was rare in patients older than 70 years.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Jul 2011
Comparative StudyOptical detection of the brachial plexus for peripheral nerve blocks: an in vivo swine study.
Accurate identification of nerves is critical to ensure safe and effective delivery of regional anesthesia during peripheral nerve blocks. Nerve stimulation is commonly used, but it is not perfect. Even when nerve stimulation is performed in conjunction with ultrasound guidance, determining when the needle tip is at the nerve target region can be challenging. In this in vivo pilot study, we investigated whether close proximity to the brachial plexus and penetration of the axillary artery can be identified with optical reflectance spectroscopy, using a custom needle stylet with integrated optical fibers. ⋯ Spectroscopic information obtained with the optical needle is distinct from nerve stimulation and complementary to ultrasound imaging, and it could potentially allow for reliable identification of the injection site during peripheral nerve blocks.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Jul 2011
ReviewClinical trial methodology of pain treatment studies: selection and measurement of self-report primary outcomes for efficacy.
The past century has seen immense progress in the advancement of methodology to evaluate efficacy of treatment interventions for acute and chronic pain. Continuing challenges revolve around how to best select and measure primary efficacy outcomes for a given analgesic trial. ⋯ In the setting of emerging new pain treatment strategies, careful consideration must be given to match current or novel outcome measures to the specific goals of a proposed trial. Future research is needed to directly compare current methods with newer measurement approaches for the critical goal of maximizing validity, reliability, and utility of different outcome measures in clinical trials of pain treatment.