Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 2005
Review Case ReportsDealing with difficult patients in your pain practice.
Pain patients can be difficult. They can provoke negative feelings of frustration and anger among clinicians and damage the doctor-patient relationship. ⋯ Issues of comorbid psychopathology, hostility, suicidality, aberrant drug behavior, and chronic noncompliance are discussed. Specific recommendations are also given of the best ways to manage patients with difficult behavior.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Jan 2005
ReviewNo evidence for analgesic effect of intra-articular morphine after knee arthroscopy: a qualitative systematic review.
Intra-articular (IA) injection of morphine has been the subject of many randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Both negative and positive results have been obtained in trials with a preemptive design, and the question of efficacy remains unresolved. Recent RCTs on patients whose inclusion was delayed until a baseline pain of at least moderate intensity was documented have illuminated the pitfalls of IA analgesic trials. Previously published systematic reviews may have included flawed RCTs in the analyses. ⋯ There are few well-controlled RCTs on IA morphine, and the negative trials of higher quality counter the evidence from the numerous positive ones of lower quality. The quality of most published trials is poor, and performing meta-analysis on these data is not meaningful. Properly controlled trials, in which early postoperative pain intensity is documented, suggest that there is no added analgesic effect of IA morphine compared with saline alone.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Jan 2005
ReviewNo evidence for analgesic effect of intra-articular morphine after knee arthroscopy: a qualitative systematic review.
Intra-articular (IA) injection of morphine has been the subject of many randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Both negative and positive results have been obtained in trials with a preemptive design, and the question of efficacy remains unresolved. Recent RCTs on patients whose inclusion was delayed until a baseline pain of at least moderate intensity was documented have illuminated the pitfalls of IA analgesic trials. Previously published systematic reviews may have included flawed RCTs in the analyses. ⋯ There are few well-controlled RCTs on IA morphine, and the negative trials of higher quality counter the evidence from the numerous positive ones of lower quality. The quality of most published trials is poor, and performing meta-analysis on these data is not meaningful. Properly controlled trials, in which early postoperative pain intensity is documented, suggest that there is no added analgesic effect of IA morphine compared with saline alone.