Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 1999
Case ReportsAnxiety, vocalization, and agitation following peripheral nerve block with ropivacaine.
Central nervous system (CNS) and cardiovascular toxicity are potential side effects of local anesthetics. However, ropivacaine has been reported to be less CNS toxic than bupivacaine in human volunteers. ⋯ This case report shows that ropivacaine may cause CNS toxicity that differs from classical signs of local anesthetic-induced toxicity. This effect might be related to the unique structure of ropivacaine, which is formulated in an S-enantiomer preparation. It has been shown that S-enantiomers bind differently to receptors in both the CNS and cardiovascular systems. This property may account for the disinhibition of select neural pathways that are specifically involved in mediation of anxiety and aggression.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEvaluation of the analgesic efficacy of EMLA cream in volunteers with differing skin pigmentation undergoing venipuncture.
Lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) applied to intact skin for 60 minutes has been shown to reduce venipuncture pain. Recent studies have suggested that lidocaine/prilocaine cream is less effective on heavily pigmented skin. The objective of this study was to evaluate the topical anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine/prilocaine cream in volunteers with varying skin pigmentation types. ⋯ Lidocaine/prilocaine cream is a safe and effective topical anesthetic for reducing pain associated with venipuncture in individuals, regardless of skin pigmentation.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 1999
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialRopivacaine 0.25% and 0.5%, but not 0.125%, provide effective wound infiltration analgesia after outpatient hernia repair, but with sustained plasma drug levels.
Ropivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic similar to bupivacaine, but with lower cardiac toxicity and intrinsic vasoconstrictive properties that may reduce the risk and extent of systemic plasma absorption. Plasma levels and risks are associated with the total dose used and the extent of absorption, with lower doses potentially representing less risk. Although both 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine provide adequate analgesia for wound infiltration after hernia repair, the efficacy of lower doses and the early systemic absorption have not been reported. ⋯ Ropivacaine 0.25% and 0.5% is adequate for pain relief after outpatient hernia repair, whereas the 0.125% solution is no more effective than saline. Prolonged systemic absorption from peripheral injection may be associated with prolonged elevations of plasma concentrations, which potentially could be associated with unexpectedly high plasma levels if repeated injections are performed in the perioperative period with higher concentrations or doses.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Mar 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialContinuous spinal anesthesia: a comparative study of standard microcatheter and Spinocath.
This prospective, randomized study evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of a new subarachnoid catheter. ⋯ Spinocath insertion required 6.3 +/- 3.2 minutes in group 1 versus 3.9 +/- 1.2 minutes in group 2 (P < .01) with similar difficulties with catheter introduction. Perception of dural puncture was better in group 1 (P < .05). There were significant intergroup differences in time to free flow of CSF through the catheter. In group 2, correct catheter positioning had to be confirmed by aspiration in 80% of cases (P < .05). At the end of surgery, the catheters were removed, and there were no significant differences between groups. The anesthetic blocks were similar with both systems. Patient opinion of the technique did not differ between groups, and regression analysis did not show any differences between groups or correlation to any incident during performance of the technique. Globally, the anesthesiologists participating in the study considered both systems to be easy to use and adequate for continuous spinal anesthesia. With respect to the advantage afforded by a directional needle in orientating the catheter within the spinal canal, the Spinocath system-with a longer technique performance time than the standard approach-involves a success rate and incidence of technical problems similar to that of the conventional technique.