Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Oct 2016
A validation study of electrical cardiometry in pregnant patients using transthoracic echocardiography as the reference standard.
To validate electrical cardiometry (EC) in pregnant patients using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as the reference standard. To improve EC accuracy via a one-time, measurement of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter. 44 non-laboring, resting women with singleton, viable pregnancies underwent simultaneous EC and TTE measurements. Data were analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis. ⋯ EC accurately measures heart rate and duration of systole when compared with TTE. Stroke volume measurements correlate but have a high bias and percentage error. Knowledge of LVOT area, by a one-time, measurement with TTE, could improve prediction of stroke volume by EC.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Oct 2016
Comparative Study Observational StudyPropofol and non-propofol based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy-prospective comparison of depth of sedation using an EEG based SEDLine monitor.
Propofol is a popular anesthetic sedative employed in colonoscopy. It is known to increase the patient satisfaction and improve throughput. However, there are concerns among the clinicians with regard to the depth of sedation, as a deeper degree of sedation is known to increase the incidence of aspiration and other adverse events. ⋯ The role of processed EEG monitors such as the SEDLine monitor to improve sedation protocols remains to be determined. Trial registration We obtained an ethical clearance from the Institute. No trial registration was mandated, as no interventional drug or investigational device were used during the study.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Oct 2016
Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?
The demise of the pulmonary artery catheter as a gold standard in cardiac output measurement has created the need for new standard. Doppler cardiac output can be measured suprasternally (USCOM) and via the oesophagus (CardioQ). Use in tandem they may provide a reliable trend line of cardiac output changes against which new technologies can be assessed. ⋯ The regression line between Doppler methods was offset with a slope of 0.9, thus CardioQ CI readings increased relative to USCOM. Both Doppler methods trended cardiac output reliably. Used in tandem they provide a new standard to assess cardiac output trending.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Oct 2016
Review Meta AnalysisAccuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Several minimally-invasive technologies are available for cardiac output (CO) measurement in children, but the accuracy and precision of these devices have not yet been evaluated in a systematic review and meta-analysis. We conducted a comprehensive search of the medical literature in PubMed, Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science from its inception to June 2014 assessing the accuracy and precision of all minimally-invasive CO monitoring systems used in children when compared with CO monitoring reference methods. Pooled mean bias, standard deviation, and mean percentage error of included studies were calculated using a random-effects model. ⋯ Although the pooled bias was small, the mean pooled percentage error was in the gray zone of clinical applicability. In the sub-group analysis, electrical cardiometry was the device that provided the most accurate measurement. However, a high heterogeneity between studies was found, likely due to a wide range of study characteristics.