Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Aug 2017
Comparative Study Observational StudyComparison of smartphone application-based vital sign monitors without external hardware versus those used in clinical practice: a prospective trial.
Use of healthcare-related smartphone applications is common. However, there is concern that inaccurate information from these applications may lead patients to make erroneous healthcare decisions. The objective of this study is to study smartphone applications purporting to measure vital sign data using only onboard technology compared with monitors used routinely in clinical practice. ⋯ The degree of correlation between monitors routinely used in clinical practice and the smartphone-based applications studied is insufficient to recommend clinical utilization. This lack of correlation suggests that the applications evaluated do not provide clinically meaningful data. The inaccurate data provided by these applications can potentially contribute to patient harm.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Aug 2017
ReviewA systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery.
This systematic review aims to summarize the published data on the reliability of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) to predict fluid responsiveness in an open-chest setting during cardio-thoracic surgery. The analysis included studies reporting receiver operating characteristics or correlation coefficients between PPV/SVV and change in any hemodynamic variables after a fluid challenge test in open-chest conditions. The literature search included seven studies. ⋯ The great heterogeneity between studies was due to small sample size and differences among protocol designs (different monitor devices, mechanical ventilation settings, fluid challenge methodologies, surgical incisions, and end-point variables). PPV and SVV seem to be inaccurate in predicting fluid responsiveness in an open-chest setting during cardio-thoracic surgery. Given the high heterogeneity of published data, more studies are needed to define the role of PPV/SVV in this context.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Aug 2017
The venous-arterial difference in CO2 should be interpreted with caution in case of respiratory alkalosis in healthy volunteers.
The venous-arterial difference in CO2 (ΔCO2) has been proposed as an index of the adequacy of tissue perfusion in shock states. We hypothesized that the variation in PaCO2 (hyper- or hypocapnia) could impact ΔCO2, partly through microcirculation adaptations. Fifteen healthy males volunteered to participate. ⋯ HCO2 induced a moderate increase of the resaturation slope of NIRS oxygenation. Skin microcirculatory blood flow significantly dropped with hCO2, while it remained unchanged with hypercapnia. Our results warrant cautious interpretation of ΔCO2 as an indicator of tissue perfusion during respiratory alkalosis.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Aug 2017
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyWhich imaging method should be used for genicular nerve radio frequency thermocoagulation in chronic knee osteoarthritis?
This study aimed to perform genicular nerve RF neurotomy using two different imaging methods, fluoroscopy and ultrasound, and to compare the clinical effects and reliability of the two methods. Fifty patients with osteoarthritis were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into group 1 (fluoroscopy imaging) and group 2 (ultrasound imaging). ⋯ There was no difference in pain relief and functional status between the ultrasound and fluoroscopy groups. Decrease in VAS score and WOMAC total score in the first and third months was significant in both groups (p < 0.001). GNRFT under ultrasound guidance was easily applicable, safe and dynamic, and required no radiation to achieve the same benefit as the fluoroscopy-guided interventions.
-
J Clin Monit Comput · Aug 2017
ReviewCommentary : The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: evidence, equipoise and outcomes.
The use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has grown despite an absence of randomized controlled trials that might unequivocally demonstrate improved outcomes. At issue is how to demonstrate value when other evidence indicates patient harms (opportunity cost) if IONM is withheld for the sake of randomization. ⋯ We also examine how clinical equipoise may resolve whether (or not) an anticipated controlled study is ethical. We conclude that the value of IONM in a particular surgical setting should be determined by a benefits/harms analysis based on all the available evidence.