Journal of palliative medicine
-
Background: Little is known about racial/ethnic differences in symptom severity among patients receiving home-based palliative care (HomePal). Objectives: To determine whether symptom severity differs between White patients and patients of color receiving HomePal and whether gender moderates the difference. Design: This is a cross-sectional exploratory study. ⋯ Conclusion: Patients of color reported lower symptom severity than White patients. More research is needed to understand how the intersection of culture and gender affects symptom experience and reporting in patients living with serious illness. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT#03694431.
-
Background: The HOPE Scale by Gowri Anandarajah is a qualitative tool for examining and assessing the spiritual needs of sick people, which can be used by health care professionals, but also other personnel whose purpose is to support the patient during illness. Aim: The aim of this study was the cultural adaptation and validation of a qualitative tool for examining the spiritual needs of patients. Methods: A six-step procedure was adopted with the inclusion of four independent forward and two backward translations and cognitive debriefing of the Polish version with experts (n = 11) and chronically ill patients (n = 15). ⋯ Following the six steps of the validation, the final Polish version of the HOPE scale was obtained, adapted stylistically and culturally to Polish conditions. Conclusions: The Polish version of the HOPE scale is culturally and linguistically adapted and is ready to be used for assessing patients' spiritual needs. The scale can be used both for research and in practice when working with chronically ill people.
-
Background: Inpatient palliative care clinical pharmacy specialists (IPCPS) on multidisciplinary palliative care (PC) teams have expanding roles in the treatment of pain, nausea, and other symptoms for patients with serious illnesses. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and financial outcomes associated with an IPCPS on an inpatient PC team. Setting and Design: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in Colorado. ⋯ Results: A total of 1543 patients were included with 228 and 1315 in the IPCPS and usual care groups, respectively. After adjustment, the IPCPS group had a greater median decrease in daily expenditures (-$22 vs. $6, p = 0.003), higher median increase in daily MME (16.5 vs. 9.7 mg, p = 0.007), and fewer patients with a subsequent hospitalization (34.2% vs. 39.2%, p = 0.010) or urgent care visit (10.5% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.024) but longer mean index hospitalization (9.3 vs. 7.7 days, p = 0.003) and no differences in AE during follow-up (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: IPCPS participation on the PC team can be a component of health care cost reduction while contributing to patient-centered quality care.