Emergencias
-
Workplace violence of any type is influenced by multiple factors and leads to physiological, psychological, social, and organizational change. Emergency and other urgent care settings have assault rates up to 5-fold higher than other health care settings. This study aimed to analyze the consequences of physical and nonphysical violence on health care and support personnel in hospital emergency departments. ⋯ Emergency departments have incidents of nonphysical workplace violence more often than physical violence. Emergency personnel with high exposure to workplace violence, particularly nonphysical assaults, experience physiological, psychosocial, and organizational changes.
-
Tools to identify patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 are as yet unavailable. Our aims were to identify factors associated with nonadverse outcomes and develop a scale to predict nonadverse evolution in patients with COVID-19 (the CoNAE scale) in hospital emergency departments. ⋯ We developed the CoNAE scale to predict nonadverse outcomes. This scale may be useful in triage for evaluating patients with COVID-19. It may also help predict safe discharge or plan the level of care that patients require not only in a hospital emergency department but also in urgent primary care settings or out-of-hospital emergency care.
-
Observational Study
A possible role for the venous-to-arterial CO2 difference in cardiogenic shock: an exploratory study.
The venous-to-arterial CO2 partial pressure difference (CO2) is a marker of how adequately capillary blood flow is able to remove CO2 from tissues, but evidence regarding its usefulness in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is scarce The main objective of this study was to describe the changes in CO2 in patients with cardiogenic shock during the 48 hours after hospital admission. A secondary objective was to analyze the association between CO2 and in-hospital mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiogenic shock refractory to treatment. ⋯ This exploratory study suggests that CO2 could be a helpful additional marker to measure when managing cardiogenic shock. CO2 lower than 6 mmHg between 12 and 24 hours after admission may identify patients at low risk of death due to CVD or refractory cardiogenic shock.