J Emerg Med
-
The 2010 Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines stated that routine sodium bicarbonate (SB) use for cardiac arrest patients was not recommended. However, SB administration during resuscitation is still common. ⋯ SB use was not associated with improvement in ROSC or survival-to-discharge rates in cardiac resuscitation. In addition, mortality was significantly increased in the North American group with SB administration.
-
Review Case Reports
Arterial Gas Emboli Secondary to Portal Venous Gas Diagnosed With Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Case Report and Literature Review.
Portal venous gas (PVG) is a rarely observed clinical finding generally associated with intestinal ischemia. The proper clinical response to the finding of PVG depends somewhat on the setting in which it is observed. Here we describe a case in which extensive arterial gas emboli (AGE) were encountered during point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and subsequent computed tomography (CT) identified PVG secondary to gastric wall ischemia as the likely source. ⋯ A 69-year-old woman with history of metastatic colon cancer presented to the emergency department (ED) with altered mental status. On arrival, she was hypotensive, hypothermic, cachectic, and with abdominal distension. POCUS was performed to evaluate the source of the patient's hypotension, revealing the presence of PVG, as well as gas bubbles in all four chambers of the heart and the aorta. CT scan revealed gastric wall ischemia and confirmed the presence of significant air emboli throughout the portal venous system. Given the overall poor prognosis, the decision was made to forego further chemotherapy or surgery and the patient died later that week while under hospice care. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: AGE can occur in the setting of PVG. This may cause multi-organ failure by disrupting blood flow to organs, especially in patients with circulatory dysfunction, such as shock. Depending on the setting in which it is diagnosed, early detection of PVG may expedite earlier assessments of a patient's negative prognosis or initiation of attempted life-saving treatment. In this case report, we show that POCUS can be used to obtain an expedited diagnosis in a critically ill patient.
-
Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common event and antiplatelet therapy might represent a risk factor for bleeding. ⋯ Patients on antiplatelet therapy have an increased risk of ICH after mild TBI compared with patients not on antithrombotic therapy. However, the risk is just slightly increased, and the need to perform a computed tomography scan in patients on antiplatelet therapy after a mild TBI should be evaluated case by case, but always considered in patients with other risk factors.
-
The concept of sepsis has recently been redefined by an International Task Force. The task force recommended the use of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score instead of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria to identify patients at high risk of mortality from sepsis outside of the intensive care unit, including in emergency departments (EDs). However, the primary outcome for qSOFA is prediction of risk for mortality, which is not the principal outcome measure considered in the ED. From the ED perspective, the priorities are the identification (diagnosis) of the septic patient and then the initiation of time-sensitive, life-saving interventions. ⋯ Based on multiple retrospective and few prospective studies, it appears that qSOFA performs poorly in comparison with SIRS as a diagnostic tool for ED patients who may have sepsis or septic shock. However, qSOFA does have a strong prognostic accuracy for mortality in those ED patients already diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock.
-
The concept of sepsis has recently been redefined by an International Task Force. The task force recommended the use of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score instead of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria to identify patients at high risk of mortality from sepsis outside of the intensive care unit, including in emergency departments (EDs). However, the primary outcome for qSOFA is prediction of risk for mortality, which is not the principal outcome measure considered in the ED. From the ED perspective, the priorities are the identification (diagnosis) of the septic patient and then the initiation of time-sensitive, life-saving interventions. ⋯ Based on multiple retrospective and few prospective studies, it appears that qSOFA performs poorly in comparison with SIRS as a diagnostic tool for ED patients who may have sepsis or septic shock. However, qSOFA does have a strong prognostic accuracy for mortality in those ED patients already diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock.