J Trauma
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of the costs of acute treatment for gunshot and stab wounds: further evidence of the need for firearms control.
Gun control is proposed primarily to decrease the incidence of injury and death from gunshot wounds (GSWs). We hypothesize that decreasing the number of GSWs will also produce significant economic savings, even if personal violence were to continue at the same rate, maintaining the same overall incidence of penetrating trauma. We analyzed charges and reimbursements for the treatment for all patients with GSWs (n = 1116) and stab wounds (SWs) (n = 1529) admitted to a level I trauma center from 1986 through 1992. ⋯ Thus, if all patients with GSWs instead suffered SWs, there would be an annual savings of $1,290,000 overall and of $981,000 of public funds from this institution alone. Treatment costs for GSWs are higher than those for SWs and are rising more rapidly, with an increasing amount of public funds going to meet these costs. Considerable savings to society would accrue from any effort that decreased firearm injuries, even if the same level of violence persisted using other weapons.
-
Comparative Study
An evaluation of expert human and automated Abbreviated Injury Scale and ICD-9-CM injury coding.
Two hundred ninety-five injury descriptions from 135 consecutive patients treated at a level-I trauma center were coded by three human coders (H1, H2, H3) and by TRI-CODE (T), a PC-based artificial intelligence software program. Two study coders are nationally recognized experts who teach AIS coding for its developers (the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine); the third has 5 years experience in ICD and AIS coding. A "correct coding" (CC) was established for the study injury descriptions. ⋯ Coders H1 and H2 were in excellent agreement. Coder H3 was in good agreement with H1 and H2. However, errors among the human coders often occur for different codes, accentuating the variability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
To evaluate the role of nonoperative management in the treatment of blunt liver trauma we examined all victims of blunt hepatic trauma admitted to our institution during a 36-month period under a protocol of nonoperative management. One hundred twenty-six patients had the diagnosis of blunt hepatic injury confirmed by abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scanning, surgical exploration, or autopsy. Twenty-four patients went to the operating room without CT scanning because of hemodynamic instability (16), peritoneal signs (two), or positive results on DPL (six). ⋯ The transfusion requirement in the first 24 hours for the nonoperative group was significantly lower than that for the group undergoing surgery (1.2 +/- 1.7 vs. 12.2 +/- 14 units). There were no instances of hemobilia, intrahepatic bile collections, or abdominal abscess in the nonoperative group. The grade of hepatic injury as diagnosed by CT scan does not predict the need for surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
A case of a 28-year-old man surviving traumatic hemipelvectomy is presented. This patient is the first reported survivor in Australia of traumatic hemipelvectomy and one of few survivors reported in the world literature. ⋯ Associated dislocation of the contralateral hip with sciatic nerve damage and subsequent heterotopic calcification has not been previously reported and presents a significant obstacle to rehabilitation. Early attention to the psychological status of the patient and early involvement of rehabilitation specialists is advocated.
-
Multicenter Study
Measuring health status among survivors of burn injury: revisions of the Burn Specific Health Scale.
This study examined the reliability of a revised version of the Burn Specific Health Scale (BSHS). Two hundred fifty-four former patients recruited from eight burn centers in the southeastern United States participated in the study. Data were collected via chart review and mailed questionnaire. ⋯ Each subscale exhibited a high level of reliability (Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.82 to 0.94). Each subscale also correlated in a predictable manner with measures used for validation. The revised measure should improve the ability of both researchers and clinicians to assess the impact of non-fatal burn injury accurately and comprehensively.