Neurochirurgie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
"MAST" prospective study: value of minimal access spine technologies technique for multicolumn spinal cord stimulation surgical lead implantation in the context of a French multicentre randomized controlled trial (ESTIMET study).
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for postoperative persistent leg pain after spine surgery, but treatment of the back pain component remains much more difficult, as it comprises mixed neuropathic and mechanical pain mechanisms. Moreover, these patients could present damaged tissues at the site of SCS lead implantation as a result of previous spine surgery. It can therefore be logically assumed that minimizing the surgical invasiveness of SCS implantation would be beneficial for these patients. Several studies have demonstrated the value of Minimal Access Spine Technologies (MAST) in spine surgery, but only a few case reports have been published concerning the use of MAST techniques for SCS. Therefore, we were prompted to conduct a second ESTIMET ancillary study to prospectively analyse the potential impact and benefits of MAST technique during SCS lead implantation versus an open surgical approach. ⋯ This is a multicentre, comparative, ancillary study conducted in 61 patients among the 115 enrolled patients ESTIMET study. One arm comprises patients undergoing multicolumn lead implantation via a Conventional Open Approach (COA) and the other arm comprises patients implanted by a MAST approach. Patients will be followed for 12 months after lead implantation. The following data will be collected: elevation of muscle enzymes (serum CPK), scar size, blood loss, infection rate, operating time and global, leg, back and scar NPRS.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation for significant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: design of a national, multicentre, randomized, controlled health economics trial (ESTIMET Study).
Many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic neuropathic radicular pain over recent decades, but despite global favourable outcomes in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) with leg pain, the back pain component remains poorly controlled by neurostimulation. Technological and scientific progress has led to the development of new SCS leads, comprising a multicolumn design and a greater number of contacts. The efficacy of multicolumn SCS lead configurations for the treatment of the back pain component of FBSS has recently been suggested by pilot studies. However, a randomized controlled trial must be conducted to confirm the efficacy of new generation multicolumn SCS. Évaluation médico-économique de la STImulation MEdullaire mulTi-colonnes (ESTIMET) is a multicentre, randomized study designed to compare the clinical efficacy and health economics aspects of mono- vs. multicolumn SCS lead programming in FBSS patients with radicular pain and significant back pain. ⋯ FBSS patients with a radicular pain VAS score≥50mm, associated with a significant back pain component were recruited in 14 centres in France and implanted with multicolumn SCS. Before the lead implantation procedure, they were 1:1 randomized to monocolumn SCS (group 1) or multicolumn SCS (group 2). Programming was performed using only one column for group 1 and full use of the 3 columns for group 2. Outcome assessment was performed at baseline (pre-implantation), and 1, 3, 6 and 12months post-implantation. The primary outcome measure was a reduction of the severity of low back pain (bVAS reduction≥50%) at the 6-month visit. Additional outcome measures were changes in global pain, leg pain, paraesthesia coverage mapping, functional capacities, quality of life, neuropsychological aspects, patient satisfaction and healthcare resource consumption.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Neuroprotective effect of gacyclidine. A multicenter double-blind pilot trial in patients with acute traumatic brain injury.
The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) injections of gacyclidine, a novel NMDA receptor antagonist, for neurological and functional recovery following acute traumatic brain injury. This multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study compared four parallel groups. Two IV doses were administrated (placebo, 2x0.005mg/kg, 2x0.001mg/kg, 2x0.02mg/kg): the first dose was given within 2 hours following the trauma, and the second dose 4 hours after the first. ⋯ Concerning efficacy, the predefined prognostic factors (initial CT-scan score, initial Glasgow Coma Scale and occurrence of low systolic blood pressure during the first 24 hours) largely determinated the patient's outcome. When the prognostic factors were taken into account together with the dose level in a logistic regression model, gacyclidine showed a beneficial long-term effect and a best dose-result in the 0.04mg/kg treated group. Data obtained in this clinical trial appeared sufficient to warrant a European multicenter study on gacyclidine using the same evaluation criteria and ICP monitoring.