Minerva anestesiologica
-
Minerva anestesiologica · May 2003
Review[Prevention of cardiovascular accidents during locoregional anesthesia].
Cardiovascular complications can be divided into 2 big categories involving the cardiovascular system in locoregional anaesthesia: those of local anaesthetics with direct effect on sympathetic fibres, which regulate the cardiovascular activity and those who derives from alteration of the normal cardiac function due to the toxic effect of the drugs. While the first are referred to the extension of a central block, the second considers the overdose caused by accidental intravenous injection. This is more frequent in peripheral blocks then in central blocks. ⋯ The prevention of those complications should foresee through an accurate anamnesis the subjective conditions of risk: so we have to choose the best individual technique and dose of anaesthetics; the use of qualitative correct material, the ENS as a support to identify nerve structures and the application of more recent and safe drugs represented by the compound of S(-) enantiomers, Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine. Which are described to be less cardiotoxic but with the same characteristics as Bupivacaine. Finally don't forget respect the classical rules of security during locoregional anaesthesia.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · May 2003
Review Comparative StudyPost-operative epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.
Patient-controlled analgesia techniques have opened a new dimension to individualize patient's need for analgesia, in the treatment of acute post-operative pain. These techniques can be used intravenously, in the epidural space, and into peripheral nerve sheets. There is a common consensus that intravenous patient-controlled analgesia should not have a continuous infusion while epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCEA) should be programmed with a continuous infusion. ⋯ The continuous epidural infusion of opioids has the advantages of fewer fluctuations in cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of drug, but it is necessary to administer a loading bolus, to overcome the fact that it takes several hours to provide adequate analgesia. The advantages of epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia are represented by better analgesia and a reduced opioids requirement, while the advantages when compared to epidural continuous infusion are: increased efficiency, self-adjustment by the patient, higher patient satisfaction, less sedation, and lower opioids dosage. The clinical advantages of PCEA may outweigh the greater cost and invasiveness of this technique.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · May 2003
Review[Anesthesia for neurosurgery in children: techniques and monitoring].
Pediatric neuroanesthesia can be seen as a specific branch of anesthesia half way in between pediatric anesthesia and neuroanesthesia. As a matter of fact, we must keep well in mind the peculiarities of the pediatric patient and the different pharmadynamic and pharmacochinetic properties of the anesthetic drugs, particularly in neonates and infants. Other relevant problems are: 1) high complexity of surgical procedures implying a difficult anesthesiological management; 2) complex blood loss management either if we want to apply a blood sparing technique strategy or if we consider the problems related to diagnosis and treatment of coagulative disorders caused by intraoperative massive blood loss; 3) management of patients with latex allergy for the high incidence, in pediatric neuroanesthesia, of patients belonging to high risk groups; 4) need of repeated radiological examinations implying several anesthesiological procedures. In this article aspects related to the anesthesiological techniques and to the hemodynamic and neurophysiological monitoring of pediatric neurosurgical patients were also discussed.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · May 2003
ReviewGuidelines on anticoagulants and the use of locoregional anesthesia.
Growing numbers of patients are treated with hemostasis altering drugs, as thromboembolic diseases are a major cause of mortality in our western society. The insertion of epidural or subarachnoidal needles and/or catheters in such patients carries the inherent risk of the development of a compressing vertebral canal hematoma. This is especially true in patients treated with thrombolytic agents or oral anticoagulants. ⋯ The available data do not allow making firm recommendations on the safe use of major neuraxial blocks. In contrast, the isolated use of acetyl-salicylic acid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is no longer considered contraindicated, but their combination with of heparin remains controversial. Intraoperative heparinization, perioperative thromboprophylactic use of unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparins are possible if: 1) a minimum time interval between the regional anesthetic block and the administration of the previous or next dose of anticoagulant is respected and; 2) the specified dose limitations of the heparin compound used are not exceeded; and 3) indwelling catheters are removed only after the disappearance of any remaining anticoagulant effect.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · May 2003
Review[Emergencies in cardiac surgery: prophylaxis or correction?].
Management of coagulation during cardiac surgery is always challenging for the anesthesiologist, even in elective operations. The strict linkage between coagulation and inflammation is amplified during cardiopulmonary bypass due to the contact of the blood with the foreign surfaces. In emergencies, coagulative derangement could be worse but the cardiocirculatory instability and parenchimal failure often overcome the attention to this problem.