Minerva anestesiologica
-
Minerva anestesiologica · Jan 2013
ReviewHow to assess positive end-expiratory pressure-induced alveolar recruitment?
Randomized trials fail to demonstrate a decrease in mortality when high Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) is applied to patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Use of PEEP in all patients without taking into consideration specific lung morphology, potential for recruitment and risk of lung hyperinflation could be one of explanations. Assessment of alveolar recruitment in each individual patient appears to reach a good compromise between optimization of mechanical ventilation and reduction of lung injury due to systematic application of high PEEP. ⋯ Different methods are available to assess PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment. Lung ultrasound and P-V curve method can be easily used at bedside to assess lung recruitability and test optimal PEEP. Further development is required for bedside assessment combing alveolar recruitment with hyperinflation.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · Jan 2013
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyDesflurane versus sevoflurane: a comparison on stress response.
Neurohumoral, immunologic and metabolic alteration characterize surgical procedures in relation with the intensity of injury, the total operating time and the anesthetic technique. We, therefore, compared the effects of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on intra and postoperative release of the stress hormones and inflammatory cytokines. ⋯ In the present study we demonstrated that desflurane and sevoflurane produced a different stress response in the setting of laparoscopic surgery. The greater release of catecholamines during desflurane anesthesia could have adverse effects in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. In low stress surgery desflurane, as compared to sevoflurane, was associated with a better control of intraoperative cortisol and ACTH response (T2). Moreover, the ACTH secretion resulted attenuated also postoperatively (T3-T4). Both gases did not influence the plasmatic levels of Il-6, CRP and glucose.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · Jan 2013
ReviewThe best timing for defibrillation in shockable cardiac arrest.
High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, i.e. chest compressions and ventilations) and prompt defibrillation when appropriate (i.e. in ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, VF/VT) are currently the best early treatment for cardiac arrest (CA). In cases of prolonged CA due to shockable rhythms, it is reasonable to presume that a period of CPR before defibrillation could partially revert the metabolic and hemodynamic deteriorations imposed to the heart by the no flow state, thus increasing the chances of successful defibrillation. Despite supporting early evidences in CA cases in which Emergency Medical System response time was longer than 5 minutes, recent studies have failed to confirm a survival benefit of routine CPR before defibrillation. ⋯ To take in account all the variables encountered when treating CA (heart condition before CA, time elapsed, metabolic and hemodynamic changes, efficacy of CPR, responsiveness to defibrillation attempt), it would be very helpful to have a real-time and non invasive tool able to predict the chances of defibrillation success. Recent evidences have suggested that ECG waveform analysis of VF, such as the derived Amplitude Spectrum Area, can fit the purpose of monitoring the CPR effectiveness and predicting the responsiveness to defibrillation. While awaiting clinical studies confirming this promising approach, CPR performed according to high quality standard and with minimal interruptions together with early defibrillation are the best immediate way to achieve resuscitation in CA due to shochable rhythms..