Geburtsh Frauenheilk
-
Geburtsh Frauenheilk · Sep 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Addition of ethanol to the distension medium in surgical hysteroscopy as screening to prevent "fluid overload". A prospective randomized comparative study of ablative versus non-ablative surgical hysteroscopy and different ethanol concentration].
For answering the question at which hysteroscopical procedures an intraoperative screening method is necessary to avoid a fluid overload and whether a beginning fluid absorption can be diagnosed early by adding ethanol to the distension medium, a prospectively randomised comparative study of ablative versus non-ablative operative hysteroscopy with differing ethanol concentrations was performed (n = 120). Purisole (a mannit/sorbit solution) was used a distension medium. The measuring parameters (breath alcohol, amount of absorbed fluid, haematocrit and haemoglobin values, central venous pressure, heart frequency) were intraoperatively determined at 5-minute intervals. ⋯ With hysteroscopical procedures such as resection of myoma, endometrium ablation and septum resection, however, an addition of ethanol of 2% to the distension medium has proved useful, because with this method absorption amounts of 400 ml and more can be detected by positive values of breath alcohol. As the result of a further absorption of fluid, delayed in time compared to the first positive value of breath alcohol, there is an increase in central venous pressure and hyponatraemia. Intraoperative ethanol monitoring is a non-invasive procedure which can be performed during ablative-operative hysteroscopies and has no negative influence on the course of the intervention and the general condition of the patients.
-
Geburtsh Frauenheilk · May 1991
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Slit drainage versus Redon drainage in a clinical comparison--initial experiences with a new kind of wound drainage system].
In a prospective, randomised study we compared the clinical properties of the established Redon drain with a new type of drain called "slit drain". Both types of drains were examined regarding the amount of drained fluid, the time elapsing until removal of the drain, the frequency of occlusion of the lumen as well as the patient's pain and the required force at extraction of the drain. ⋯ If used as nonsuction drains, the new device was able to drain more fluid than the established type of drain (p less than 0.05). Statistically relevant advantages of the slit drain were seen in a lower rate of obstruction of the lumen, a higher amount of drained fluid (as non-suction device) as well as an easier and less painful extraction.