Qual Saf Health Care
-
Qual Saf Health Care · Oct 2008
Systems ambiguity and guideline compliance: a qualitative study of how intensive care units follow evidence-based guidelines to reduce healthcare-associated infections.
Consistent compliance with evidence-based guidelines is challenging yet critical to patient safety. We conducted a qualitative study to explore the underlying causes for non-compliance with evidence-based guidelines aimed at preventing four types of healthcare-associated infections in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) setting. ⋯ The concept of systems ambiguity is useful to understand causes of non-compliance with evidence-based guidelines aimed at reducing healthcare-associated infections. Multi-faceted interventions are needed to reduce different ambiguity types, hence to improve guideline compliance.
-
Qual Saf Health Care · Oct 2008
An educational and audit tool to reduce prescribing error in intensive care.
To reduce prescribing errors in an intensive care unit by providing prescriber education in tutorials, ward-based teaching and feedback in 3-monthly cycles with each new group of trainee medical staff. ⋯ Prescriber education and feedback reduce manual prescribing errors in intensive care.
-
Qual Saf Health Care · Oct 2008
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyTexting appointment reminders to repeated non-attenders in primary care: randomised controlled study.
Failure to attend appointments compromises health service efficiency. Despite considerable interest in using novel technologies to improve attendance, evidence from rigorously conducted controlled studies is lacking. ⋯ Although the intervention showed promise, we failed to demonstrate significant reduction in non-attendance rates, as a result of texting appointment reminders to patients who persistently fail to attend their general practice appointments.
-
Qual Saf Health Care · Oct 2008
Reporting of Clinical Adverse Events Scale: a measure of doctor and nurse attitudes to adverse event reporting.
To develop a validated measure of professionals' attitudes towards clinical adverse event reporting (CAER). ⋯ Initial development of an evidence-based, psychometrically rigorous measure of attitudes towards CAER has been reported. Following additional testing, RoCAES may be used to systematically elicit professionals' views about, and inform interventions to improve, reporting behaviour.