Progress in cardiovascular diseases
-
Prog Cardiovasc Dis · Jul 2010
Historical ArticleThe contribution of the Framingham Heart Study to the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a global perspective.
The Framingham Heart Study has been a trailblazer in the field of cardiovascular epidemiology. The wealth of novel scientific data that it has generated over 5 decades has made a significant contribution to cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in the United States and indirectly influenced global CVD prevention strategies. The Framingham Study has provided insights into the prevalence, incidence, prognosis, predisposing factors, and determinants of CVD. ⋯ When these findings were first published, these were novel cardiovascular risk factors, now they are the major focus for global and national prevention efforts for reducing the burden of CVD and other major noncommunicable diseases. The Framingham Heart Study has also been in the forefront of the development of cardiovascular risk prediction equations for assessment of absolute risk. Further developments in this area including the development of World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension risk prediction charts have resulted in a paradigm shift in CVD prevention strategies, from a single risk factor focus to a more cost-effective total cardiovascular risk approach, an approach recommended by the World Health Organization for CVD prevention worldwide.
-
The Framingham Heart Study remains the most famous and influential investigation in cardiovascular disease epidemiology. To generations of epidemiologists, it is a model for the cohort design. Here we revisit the origins of the Framingham Study before it became an accomplished and famous investigation whose existence and success are taken for granted. ⋯ Epidemiology was primarily focused on infectious disorders. Framingham's pioneers struggled to invent an appropriate epidemiological approach to this chronic disease and to establish support for a new kind of research within a community. Thereafter they had to convince skeptical medical professionals that the results of epidemiological investigations of heart disease were applicable to their clinical practices.