International journal of nursing studies
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of a nurse-led post-discharge advance care planning programme for community-dwelling patients nearing the end of life and their family members: A randomised controlled trial.
Although evidence increasingly demonstrates the effects of advance care planning, the relevant studies are of questionable quality, and lack consensus regarding when and with whom to initiate the conversation. ⋯ This study showed that a nurse-led structured advance care planning programme could effectively improve dyadic congruence regarding end-of-life care preferences, reduce patients' decisional conflict and increase the documentation of care preferences. The findings underscored the importance of supporting nurses to introduce advance care planning at an earlier time that enable patients with sufficient time to contemplate end-of-life issues, empower patients to deliberate their choices and engage patients and their family members in open discussion.
-
The international nursing shortage has implications for the quality and safety of patient care. Various studies report that nurses do not have time to complete all necessary nursing care tasks, potentially resulting in nurse-perceived time pressure. Providing good care in the current nursing environment often poses a real ethical challenge for nurses. How nurses experience caring for cancer patients under time pressure and how they deal with the limited time available in achieving an ethical nursing practice remains unclear. ⋯ Time pressure is a widely recognised and experienced phenomenon among nurses which has substantial negative implications for the quality and safety of patient care. Our findings reinforce the need to establish better support for nurses and to reduce the circumstances in which nurses are ethically challenged to provide good care due to time pressure. Based on our findings, we recommend investing more in the nursing culture and nurses' personal development, in addition to optimising nurse staffing levels.
-
Mechanical ventilation is a routine intervention for the critically ill but patients' experiences of this intervention are largely hidden from clinicians. A comprehensive understanding of Intensive Care Units survivors' accounts is required to provide health professionals with evidence about the patients' experience to deliver patient-centred care. ⋯ For the first time the pooling of qualitative findings from international studies, using meta-ethnography, has provided a patient-centred model of mechanical ventilation survivors' experiences of their care processes. Patients may actively engage or passively endure the treatment burden associated with mechanical ventilation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Handgrip exercise reduces peripherally-inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis in patients with solid cancers: A randomized controlled trial.
Peripherally-inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis has serious complications including the loss of vascular access, recurrent venous thrombosis, and post-thrombotic syndrome. Current guidelines recommend non-pharmacological strategies to prevent peripherally-inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis. There is little evidence for the effectiveness of handgrip exercise on the prevention of peripherally-inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis. ⋯ Handgrip exercise using an elastic ball daily for three weeks could decrease the incidence of peripherally-inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis. The method is simple, with no negative consequence reported. Further studies are required to confirm this conclusion and to explore the optimal frequency of handgrip exercise.
-
Deficient communication during shift change can cause negative patient outcomes and hinder person-centeredness in care. Person-centered handover is performed together with the patient at bedside, with the intention of providing a safe and efficient handover while promoting patient participation. The knowledge about nurse perspectives on handover models that involve patient participation is sparse. ⋯ The intentions of person-centered handovers differed from the way it was actually performed, especially in regards to the obtained levels of patient participation, as described by nurses. Professional insecurity in relation to bedside communication with patients and their visitors is a novel finding that should be considered when implementing person-centered handovers. Overall, the perceptions of person-centered handovers, as expressed by the nurses, enhance our understanding of what to consider when implementing the model and why compliance may vary.