Dtsch Arztebl Int
-
A problem encountered by medical examiners is that they have to assess injuries that have already been medically treated. Thus, they have to base their reports on clinical forensic examinations performed hours or days after an injury was sustained, or even base their assessment solely on information gleaned from medical files. In both scenarios, the forensic examiner has to rely heavily on the first responder's documentation of the original injury pattern. Medical priority will be to immediately treat a patient's injuries, and the first responder may, in addition, initially be unaware of a possibly criminal origin of an injury. As a result, the documentation of injuries is frequently of limited value for forensic purposes. This situation could be improved if photographic records were briefly made of injuries before they were treated. ⋯ With the requisite technical background knowledge, injuries can be photographically recorded to forensic standards during patient care.
-
Errors in drug administration are among the commonest medical errors. Children are particularly at risk for such errors because of the need to calculate doses individually. Doses that are ten times the correct amount (1000% of the correct dose) are occasionally given and can be life-threatening. In a simulated resuscitation in a pediatric emergency room, an error of this type occurred for one of the 32 medications that were ordered. The highest error rates are to be expected in prehospital emergency medicine. In this review, we analyze the process of ordering medications and describe the potential interventions for lowering error rates that have been evaluated to date. ⋯ Children in medical emergency situations are at significant risk for medication errors. The measures described here can markedly lower the rate of dangerous errors.
-
The use of technical aids to confirm brain death is a controversial matter. Angiography with the intra-arterial administration of contrast medium is the international gold standard, but it is not allowed in Germany except in cases where it provides a potential mode of treatment. The currently approved tests in Germany are recordings of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), brain perfusion scintigraphy, transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD), and electroencephalography (EEG). CT angiography (CTA), a promising new alternative, is being increasingly used as well. ⋯ In this study, the technical aids yielded discordant results in 14% of cases, necessitating interpretation by an expert examiner. The perfusion tests, in particular, can give false-positive results in patients with large cranial defects, skull fractures, or cerebrospinal fluid drainage. In such cases, electrophysiologic tests or a repeated clinical examination should be performed instead. CTA is a promising, highly reliable new method for demonstrating absent intracranial blood flow. In our view, it should be incorporated into the German guidelines for the diagnosis of brain death.
-
Editorial Comment Comparative Study
CT angiography in the diagnosis of brain death.