Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Comparison of intubating condition under sevoflurane and halothane anesthesia in pediatric patients].
We compared intubating conditions under sevoflurane (group S) and halothane (group H) anesthesia in pediatric patients for otorhinolaryngological surgery. One hundred and six patients were divided randomly into group S (n = 60) and group H (n = 46). Anesthesia was induced with nitrous oxide-oxygen-sevoflurane (GOS, end-tidal sevoflurane concentration; 4.5%) or nitrous oxide-oxygen-halothane (GOF, end-tidal halothane concentration; 1.6%). ⋯ There were significantly more cases in group S than in group H in which vocal cord visibility was insufficient. Body movement during intubation was observed in 27% and 26% of patients in group S and H, respectively. In conclusion, halothane anesthesia provides better intubating conditions than sevoflurane anesthesia in slow induction for pediatric patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[The dosage of sedative was reduced by patient-controlled sedation during epidural anesthesia].
The dosage of sedatives required for sedation was studied in patients who underwent total abdominal histerectomy under epidural anesthesia using patient-controlled sedation (PCS) and in those with anesthesiologist-controlled sedation (ACS). Patients in experimental groups received 1.0 or 1.5 mg bolus dose of midazolam by their request until desirable sedation was obtained using a computer-controlled device. ⋯ The level of sedation showed wider variation in PCS groups than in ACS groups. The results suggest that PCS is a technique which allows reduction of sedatives in patients who undergo operation under local anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[The effect of subcutaneous administration of buprenorphine with patient controlled analgesia system for post-operative pain relief].
We conducted a study comparing patients receiving continuous subcutaneous administration of analgesia with self controlled analgesia system (CSAA group) with those receiving continuous epidural infusion (Epi group) for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery. Fourteen patients were randomized into two groups: CSAA group (n = 7) received 20 micrograms.h-1 of buprenorphine (Bu) subcutaneously with additional 20 micrograms of Bu using Baxter infusor BB+PCA; Epg group (n = 7) received continuous epidural infusion of 0.4 mg of Bu and 46 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine daily (16.7 micrograms.h-1 of Bu) using Baxter infusor 2 ml.h-1 type. In both groups, patients received supplemental 0.1 mg of Bu subcutaneously as needed. ⋯ There was no severe side effect in both groups. We conclude that continuous subcutaneous administration of analgesic was effective for postoperative analgesia, and almost the same analgesic effect was obtained as compared with continuous epidural analgesia. We calculated that the adequate dose of Bu subcutaneously during early postoperative period to be about 30 micrograms.h-1 of Bu.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Effects of pressure support ventilation (PSV) or PSV+PEEP on the respiratory function during general anesthesia under spontaneous ventilation].
This study was performed to examine the hypothesis that PSV with PEEP compared to spontaneous breathing with a circle anesthesia system may have beneficial effects on gas exchange and work of breathing during inhalational anesthesia. Nine patients (age; 58 +/- 20 yr) scheduled to receive general anesthesia for orthopedic (n = 3) or ENT (n = 6) surgery were randomly assigned in a triple cross-over manner to breathe with a standard anesthesia circle system, 5 cmH2O PSV, and 5 cm H2O PSV above 5 cmH2O PEEP. General anesthesia was induced with thiamylal (5 mg.kg-1) and succinylcholine (1 mg.kg-1), followed by tracheal intubation. ⋯ PaCO2 was lower during PSV+PEEP, but the difference was not significant. This level of PSV or PSV with PEEP may have little beneficial effects on gas exchange in our study condition. The mean WOBp was smaller in the PSV with PEEP group but the difference was not statistically significant.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Effect of continuous infusion of flumazenil on unexpected postoperative resedation by midazolam].
Resedation after general anesthesia induced by midazolam is thought to be not an unusual problem for the anesthetists. We investigated the effect of continuous infusion of flumazenil on the patients who had general anesthesia using midazolam as an induction agent and had flumazenil for prolonged recovery after procedure. Fourteen of 54 patients were judged as prolonged recovery and were given 0.25 mg of flumazenil. ⋯ In the second group, 0.25 mg of flumazenil in 250 ml of lactated Ringer's solution was given continuously for 2 hours after the first flumazenil. All the patients were fully awake after the first flumazenil but one case of resedation occurred in the first group and in none of the patients in the second group. We conclude that continuous infusion of 0.25 mg of flumazenil for 2 hours is effective and makes anesthetist free from anxiety of postoperative resedation by midazolam.