Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology
-
The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of the Pentax-AWS for tracheal intubation during chest compression, compared with that of the Macintosh laryngoscope. ⋯ Compared to the Macintosh laryngoscopy, Pentax-AWS offers advantages for novice laryngoscopists during chest compression, while these benefits are not seen with experts' hands.
-
Meta Analysis
[Video Laryngoscopy Reduces the Incidence of Erroneous Esophageal Intubation: A Meta-analysis].
The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the incidence of erroneous esophageal intubations by video laryngoscopy to that by direct laryngoscopy. ⋯ Our meta-analysis showed that video laryngoscopy would reduce the incidence of erroneous esophageal intubations.
-
Meta Analysis
[Efficacy of videolaryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials].
Increased evidence indicates that the videolaryngoscope is useful for nasotracheal intubation. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of videolaryngoscopes (Glidescope, Airtraq and Pentax-AWS) in nasotracheal intubations, comparing with that of Macintosh laryngoscopy. ⋯ Our meta-analysis showed that the videolaryngoscope has an advantage over Macintosh laryngoscope in nasotracheal intubations.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
[Efficacy of Glidescope video laryngoscope in difficult airways: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials].
Increased evidence indicates that the Glidescope video laryngoscope (GVL) is useful for difficult tracheal intubations. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of the GVL in difficult tracheal intubations, comparing with that of Macintosh laryngoscopy. ⋯ Our meta-analysis showed that GVL has an advantage over Macintosh laryngoscope in respect to the success rate for difficult tracheal intubations.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Meta Analysis Comparative Study
[Airtraq for difficult airways: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials].
Increased evidence indicates that the Airtraq is useful for difficult tracheal intubations. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of the Airtraq in difficult airways, comparing with that of Macintosh laryngoscopy. ⋯ There is considerable evidence that Airtraq has an advantage over Macintosh laryngoscope in difficult airways.