Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg · Jan 1992
Comparative StudyDouble burst stimulation for monitoring profound neuromuscular blockade: a comparison with posttetanic count and train of four.
Double burst stimulation (DBS) is a new nerve stimulation pattern introduced to facilitate tactile evaluation of recovery from neuromuscular blockade. DBS consists of two bursts of high frequency stimulations separated by a short time interval. The relationships between DBS, post-tetanic count (PTC) and train-of-four (TOF) on the evoked twitch response was investigated in 16 surgical patients and 7 intensive care patients given atracurium for muscle relaxation. ⋯ When the first twitch of TOF was still not measurable, the first twitch of DBS ranged from 0 to 20% of the TOF-control twitch height. Furthermore the DBS ratio was significantly correlated to the TOF ratio (r = 0.92-0.96, p < 0.0002). It is concluded that DBS not only can be used for monitoring of recovery from neuromuscular blockade, but also for monitoring of intense degrees of neuromuscular blockade.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg · Jan 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPostoperative analgesia for major abdominal surgery with continuous thoracic epidural infusion of bupivacaine with sufentanil, versus bupivacaine with morphine. A randomized double blind study.
Forty-six patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were given postoperative epidural analgesia for four days with bupivacaine-sufentanil or bupivacaine-morphine. Both groups received a bolus of 8 ml bupivacaine 0.5% followed after 30 minutes by an infusion of 20 ml/h bupivacaine 0.1%. The sufentanil group (group A: 21 patients) received a loading dose of 50 micrograms sufentanil and a continuous infusion of 5 micrograms/h sufentanil. ⋯ There was also a high incidence of hypotension after the loading dose of bupivacaine 0.5%. Although we noticed a large incidence of pruritus, no patient needed naloxone reversal. In view of these side effects we recommend a lower loading dose of both bupivacaine and sufentanil.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg · Jan 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEpidural bupivacaine versus epidural sufentanil anesthesia: hemodynamic differences during induction of anesthesia and abdominal dissection in aortic surgery.
The present study was designed to compare the hemodynamic changes of epidural bupivacaine (EB) with epidural sufentanil (ES), supplemented by general anesthesia, in patients scheduled for abdominal aorto-iliac surgery. Twenty-eight ASA Grade 2 patients randomly received bupivacaine 0.5%, 1-1.5 mg kg-1 (n = 14) or sufentanil 150 micrograms (n = 14) epidurally at T12-L1, combined with light general anesthesia. Hemodynamics were measured before (T1) and after (T2) injection of EB or ES, after induction of general anesthesia (T3), and during the aortic dissection period (T4). ⋯ The induction of general anesthesia caused a significant fall in heart rate (HR) and cardiac index (CI) in the ES group. Abdominal dissection restored systemic pressure and cardiac index in the ES group. It was concluded that both ES and EB provided adequate analgesia and hemodynamics during tracheal intubation and abdominal dissection for aorto-iliac surgery.