Cahiers d'anesthésiologie
-
Since the last decade, lumbar epidural analgesia has gained widespread use in obstetrics. Approximately 80% of parturients receive epidural analgesia for labour and vaginal delivery as well as caesarean section in most centres. There is little doubt that the most successful application of epidural analgesia during labour, considered by more than 75% of primiparas as extremely painful. ⋯ Thus, epidural analgesia usually can be extended to relieve both uterine pain and pain related to distension of the lower birth canal, as well as providing analgesia for forceps delivery or caesarean section. Epidural analgesia allows the mother to be awake, minimizes or completely avoids the problems of maternal aspiration and avoids neonatal drug depression from general anaesthetics. If the most popular indication for epidural analgesia is the provision of pain relief, there are certain complications of pregnancy in which epidural analgesia appears to be indicated on therapeutic grounds such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, breech delivery, multiple pregnancy, incoordinate uterine action and fetal and/or maternal medical complications.
-
Cahiers d'anesthésiologie · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Evaluation of 2 dosages of fentanyl in caudal anesthesia. A prospective randomized double-blind study].
A caudal block is currently performed in children. A randomized and double blind study including two dosages of fentanyl: 0.5 microgram.kg-1 (group I) and 1 micrograms.kg-1 (group II) in association with bupivacaine 0.25% at a dosage of 1 mL.kg-1 was carried out. Two groups of 25 children undergoing urogenital or orthopaedic surgery participated in this study. ⋯ Furthermore, recovery of anaesthesia was rapid and calm. The frequency of nausea and vomiting was respectively 24% and 20% in groups I and II and did not require any specific therapy. Therefore it appears that caudal block with bupivacaine 0.25% and fentanyl 0.5 microgram.kg-1 is a very satisfactory technique in children when indicated.
-
Hepatic injuries account for about 45% of all abdominal traumas and for 30 to 40% of penetrating abdominal injuries. In 60% of the cases, they are associated with other lesions, especially life-threatening head injuries. ⋯ Surgical care, relying mainly on perihepatic packing and vascular exclusion techniques must remain as conservative as possible. Once haemodynamics have been stabilized in patients who do not present any other abdominal lesion requiring laparotomy, the non-interventional attitude is often successful and bears lower morbidity.
-
Cahiers d'anesthésiologie · Nov 1986
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Preventive antibiotics in cardiac surgery: cefazolin versus cefamandole].
A prospective, randomized study was carried out to evaluate two antibiotic prophylactic regimens for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Each patient of the first group (cefazolin) received four intravenous injections of 1 g cefazolin during 12 hours, patients of second (cefamandole), four doses of 750 mg. 155 patients scheduled for cardiac operation were included in the study. (May 1983 to April 1984). Patients were not admitted to the study in case of emergency, if their weight was less than 20 kg, if they had received antibiotics during the week before surgery or if they had a history of anaphylactic reactions to cephalosporins. ⋯ Hospital stay was the similar in the two groups. The two antibiotics are similarly effective to prevent major infections in cardiac surgery. However cefazolin was preferred for antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery because of the higher rate of streptococcal urinary infections in patients given cefamandole.
-
Cahiers d'anesthésiologie · Jan 1991
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[A comparison of midazolam and diazepam in premedication using the intramuscular route].
A double blind study has been carried out on 60 women undergoing gynaecological surgery: they were divided into 2 groups who were given as premedication either midazolam: 10 mg, or diazepam: 15 mg intramuscularly. No significant differences between both groups concerning heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate were found. After 30 min sedation of anxiety was noted in 30 subjects (100%) after midazolam and in 20 subjects (67%) after diazepam (P less than 0.001). ⋯ Amnesia of the immediate postoperative period was 100% in both groups. Midazolam as compared with diazepam can be regarded as a superior intramuscular premedicant. This superiority can been explained by a rapid and good resorption.